14. Rinse and Repeat: Becoming a Go-To Lawyer
When a company's general counsel is first made aware of an issue or new law suit that requires attention, who is he or she going to call? Have you developed your relationship with that GC to be that "go-to" person?
July 21, 2021 at 12:06 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
When a company's general counsel is first made aware of a new issue or problem that requires attention, who is he or she going to call? Have you developed your relationship with that GC to be that "go-to" counsel?
We've talked in previous lessons about getting to know your client's business deeply, using that knowledge to develop a relationship, and operating efficiently to provide value to the client. Well, here's where that pays off.
The GC who is faced with a new problem will mentally skim through possible counsel, using an established perception of each one. It's not just about how technically competent each one is in the subject area, it's also about how well they understand the client and its business, and how they operate. Are they accessible, are they responsive, and most of all, are they reliable? GCs make these decisions for a living, and many say that it's part science, part instinct. It's worth stating the obvious here; becoming a go-to lawyer is all about the picture the GC has of you, and then recognizing that this is something you can influence positively. Think of it as your personal brand, as perceived by the client, and then focus on enhancing it.
When you do get the call, your first response is key. Sometimes your reaction to the call will be a complete answer. But more often than not, you'll need to give some initial insights based on your knowledge of the client, and then suggest a plan to build a solution. Clients are invariably fine with this. It shows that you understand both the client and the problem, and that you'll help them navigate a way through it.
This is why it's vital to invest the groundwork in understanding the client's business, basic needs and major pain points. If you've done this, the GC will feel comfortable that you'll use this as a base when giving advice.
Maybe you recommend to have the company's summer interns research past transactions or corporate filings. Or maybe you recommend not spending a lot of resources responding to the latest issue right now because you know the company needs those resources deployed elsewhere as they are shorthanded due to the pandemic or there are some tasks not easily done while working remotely. Or maybe you offer to conduct some initial research to help you decide together what course of action should be taken.
Your knowledge of the client's business, its operational needs and resources will be essential to providing an early assessment, and then collaborating with the GC on the next steps. Often this will involve some research and reflection, which you can present as concise, actionable items, options and recommendations. This will justify the GC's decision, deepen the relationship and lead to you being the first one the GC calls next time. Good process, good outcome — rinse and repeat.
On the other hand, if you haven't built a sufficient understanding the client, the chances are you won't get the call because you're not up to speed on the business context. In other words, you're not perceived as go-to counsel.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGroen Strokoff O'Neill, LLC adds accomplished Trial Lawyer, William "Bill" Coppol.
1 minute readCushman Benchmark Survey (the “Sweepstakes”) Official Terms and Conditions
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-87
- 2The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 3Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 4Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 5Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250