COVID-19 Concerns Are Growing Again in Big Law: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
July 29, 2021 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
SAFETY NOT GUARANTEED - Big Law attorneys are more fearful of a COVID-19 infection than attorneys at small firms, as large firms grapple with returning their attorneys to the office full time, the COVID-19 Delta variant and the profound popularity of remote work, Law.com's Dylan Jackson reports. Ru Bhatt, a partner in the associate practice group at Major, Lindsey & Africa, said lagging vaccination numbers and rise of the new Delta variant have caused safety concerns to flare up again. Other recruiters have noticed the same. "I've been hearing from a lot of people that they do have safety concerns because of the number of people who aren't vaccinated," Bhatt said, adding that concerns about Delta variant have led to "reluctance to go back into the office and, especially, travel again." Alex Su, an attorney influencer and former Sullivan & Cromwell associate, said he has been taking greater precautions such as wearing his mask more often outside of his house in the past few weeks. He added that he has "heard rumblings" that many firms are now considering pushing back their office return plans. "I was feeling very comfortable and heard about this Delta variant and started putting my mask back on in certain places," Su said.
DATA DEARTH - Yesterday, we discussed how law firms could ingratiate themselves to clients by simply asking for feedback once in awhile. Here's another relationship hack for firms: give your clients the gift of data. Data on budgets. Data on risk. All. The. Data. As Law.com's Dan Clark reports, GCs are increasingly looking for law firms that can collect and synthesize information that will help corporations improve their decision-making about legal strategy and spend. But relatively few firms are able to actually deliver, according to in-house sources. Lindsey Haswell, chief administrative and legal officer of crypto exchange Blockchain.com, said it's perplexing how law firms are still analog, saying she is "really frustrated" with them. Clients need data to better understand their own outside counsel spend and to assess the risk involved in particular legal strategies. For example, rather than settling for an anecdotal answer about the potential risk in pursuing a certain legal avenue, Haswell pushes her outside counsel to discuss "the percentage likelihood of an occurrence." "Too often the law firms put the general counsel and her team in the middle of having to interpret that to the business client," she said.
NOT-SO-PRIVATE EYES - Counsel at Greenberg Traurig on Wednesday removed a biometric privacy class action against Alcon, the Texas-based eye care company, to Illinois Northern District Court. The complaint, filed by Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane & Conway and Siri & Glimstad, arises from the company's virtual try-on feature for purchasing eyeglasses. The case is 1:21-cv-04019, Taylor et al v. Alcon Vision, LLC. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
HIGH FINANCE IN HONG KONG - Rimon Law has set its sights on Asia, having applied to open an office in Hong Kong with two potential partners in the pipeline, Law.com International's Jessica Seah reports. A Hong Kong office launch will mark its third Asian office, after Shenzhen in 2019 and South Korea earlier this year. The firm's plan is for its Hong Kong offering to focus on advising high-value financing work, and its presence in the city will fulfil what the firm sees as the three pillars of global finance, alongside New York and London. "A lot of law firms are leaving Hong Kong which is why we see an opportunity to go in," said Michael Moradzadeh, Rimon's San Francisco-based founding partner and chief executive officer. "A lot of our China practice has been led by our tech practice so Hong Kong will be our finance practice. Those are our biggest practice areas—high tech, high finance, and entertainment."
WHAT YOU SAID
"Five weeks ago, it was announced there was no need for masks for vaccinated individuals. We saw that as a pathway to going back to a practice that we have known. With the current variant and guidance on wearing masks, it's changed the circumstances. We're paying close attention."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Vaccine Suit Against United Airlines Hangs on Right-to-Sue Letter Date
3 minute readState High Court Bucks Trend Favoring Insurers, Sides With Restaurants Seeking COVID-19 Coverage
Forward-Looking Statements Don't Support Securities Case Against Peloton Following Pandemic Spike
2 minute readFederal Lawsuit Seeks $400M In COVID-19 PPE Commission Revenues to Be Handed Over
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250