Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
ESG REALITY CHECK – As companies focus more on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues, firms with ESG practices are looking at a significant growth opportunity—if they can win their clients' work in the first place. And it's not as easy as having the best legal experts on staff. Dan Packel reports that clients want firms that 'walk the walk'—in other words, ones for whom ESG is not just a practice but a way of life. Clients are looking for firms with young, diverse talent, where ESG is a part of the leadership strategy and not just delineated to volunteer groups. And of course, many want to see firms that have made a positive, real-world impact on issues like the environment and diversity. "What they're looking for is not the pure regulatory advice," said former Baker & McKenzie global chief strategy officer Julia Hayhoe. "They want firms that are taking a role in policy-shaping forums."
LEGAL TECH ALUMNI – While the pandemic played a large part in legal tech education becoming more prominent, legal tech companies have also played a big role in expanding law schools' curricula. Victoria Hudgins reports on the legal tech founders that have fostered more legal tech awareness and education at their alma maters. Of course, there's a benefit for these legal tech companies—namely, access to alumni networks and exposing more students to a different career path, which could go a long way in addressing the legal tech market's lack of diversity. But it's not a one-way street—law schools also gain access to a well of legal tech expertise and fellowship programs that give their students real-world experience in a legal tech startup.
FIRST UK, NOW AUSTRALIA? – A group of Uber drivers in Australia has filed a suit against the ride-hailing company in a bid to get a federal court to rule that Uber drivers are employees rather than contractors, and therefore entitled to certain benefits, including sick pay, holiday pay and pensions. Christopher Niesche reports that the group alleges that Uber is violating the Australian Fair Work Act by failing to keep records of drivers' employment and not handing out pay slips. A ruling on the matter will likely have to consider how to classify those workers. The suit comes less than six months after the U.K. Supreme Court ruled that Uber drivers within its borders are "workers" entitled to minimum wage, paid holidays and other legal protections. The ruling was a setback for Uber, which has successfully resisted such changes in the past, most notably in California.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
With Norms 'Largely Broken Down,' Senators Want Courts to Resolve Executive Privilege Fights
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250