Why Law Firms Can't Keep Cutting Forever: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
August 11, 2021 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
WARNING SHOTS - The spread of the Delta variant has dashed dreams of a post-pandemic fall, instead forcing a number of law firms in recent weeks to delay or alter their office return plans, including mandating vaccinations for those resuming in-person work. As we examine in this week's Law.com Trendspotter column, the internal and external messaging from firms that have postponed their return dates has reflected a recognition that rushing back to the office too hastily is not only potentially unsafe, but also unnecessary. At the same time, the proliferation of vaccine mandates demonstrates that there is an increasing unwillingness on the part of firm leaders to compromise on reaching the goal of getting folks back together sooner rather than later. Before we dive in, I'm interested to hear what you think: given the uncertainty surrounding the Delta variant, is it still worth it for firms to continue pushing for a fall office return? If so, should more firms be mandating vaccinations? Let me know at [email protected].
THE FIRST CUT IS THE DEEPEST - Expense cuts gave a big boost to many law firms' bottom lines in 2020. And with the pandemic dragging on, there may be even more unexpected savings on the horizon as 2021 winds down. But, as Law.com's Andrew Maloney reports, cutting alone is not a sound long-term strategy for growing profitability. "It's always tough to count on cuts to expenditures as a long-term formula for improved profitability, because you can only ever cut so far," Bill Josten, a senior legal industry analyst for Thomson Reuters, said. That's particularly true with regard to pandemic-era savings, many of which will not be replicable in a world that isn't on lockdown. "These cuts in particular are difficult to rely on for long-term profitability, because everyone knows they're somewhat artificial, and will reverse to some extent. It's not like we'll get back to 100% of the expenditures we saw in the past, maybe ever," Josten said. "But everyone knows at some point, they will reverse." Both Josten and Kristen Stark, a California-based principal at Fairfax Associates, said firms would be wise to use the gains made during the last two years to invest in things that will save money in the long term, such as staffing pools, changes to office leases or occupancy, and new technology.
THE OWLS ARE NOT WHAT THEY SEEM - Perkins Coie filed a trademark lawsuit Monday in Colorado District Court on behalf of cybersecurity provider DarkOwl. The complaint seeks a declaration of noninfringement on the trademarks of ArkOwl, which has sent the plaintiff two cease-and-desist letters. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 1:21-cv-02163, DarkOwl, LLC v. ArkOwl LLC et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
- Google, Apple and Facebook Object to 'Frankenstein' Case Over Casino Apps By Amanda Bronstad
- Diversity Dipped Among Fortune 1000 GCs in 2020 By Trudy Knockless
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
CYBER INSECURITY - The explosive growth in cyberattacks and their increasing sophistication in recent years has created a need among large institutions, tech companies and data-driven companies in the Netherlands for legal advice on incident response plans and procedures, as well as ad-hoc legal advice on data breach incidents and ransomware attacks. Some national and international firms—Van Doorne, Brinkhof, Dentons and Baker McKenzie to name a few—have seen the cybersecurity gap in the Dutch market and jumped into it. But, as Law.com International's Linda A. Thompson reports, most large law firms in the Netherlands do not have the capacity to advise clients on these types of matters. "Most of the large law firms in the Netherlands indeed do not have a large privacy team," said Elisabeth Thole, head of Van Doorne's privacy team. Describing Van Doorne as "an exception to this rule," she added: "Since many years we have one of the largest experienced privacy teams in the Netherlands, focusing on high-end specialized data protection work, varying from compliance work to large enforcement and data breach cases."
WHAT YOU SAID
"OAN helped create and cultivate an alternate reality where up is down, pigs have wings, and Dominion engaged in a colossal fraud to steal the presidency from Donald Trump by rigging the vote."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLeaning Into ‘Core’ Strengths, Jenner’s Revenue Climbs 17%, Profits Soar 23%
4 minute readHow Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
4 minute readProfits Surge Across Big Law Tiers, but Am Law 50 Segmentation Accelerates
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
- 2Lack of Jurisdiction Dooms Child Sex Abuse Claim Against Archdiocese of Philadelphia, says NJ Supreme Court
- 3DC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents
- 4Growth of California Firms Exceeded Expectations, Survey of Managing Partners Says
- 5Blank Rome Adds Life Sciences Trio From Reed Smith
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250