When Clients' and Law Firms' Vax Policies Don't Match: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
August 16, 2021 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Law Firm Client RelationshipsWant to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
SHOULD I STAY OR SHOULD I GO NOW? - Should law firms send lawyers to meet with clients that aren't mandating COVID-19 vaccines, when the law firm itself has required them for personnel? That's the latest in the very, very, very long line of perplexing questions that have arisen for law firms over the past year-and-a-half. Michael Hammer, CEO of Dickinson Wright, told Law.com's Patrick Smith that his firm has been giving consideration to this very issue recently. "This is especially important to people who have small kids," he said, adding that, for now, his firm is holding off on a travel restriction or additional safety measures for those who travel to client sites that don't mandate vaccines. But, like everything else in the pandemic, that could shift quickly. "If it evolves that travel is a real risk and they are not only going to be affected but also potentially spread the virus, we would have to consider it," Hammer said. Mary K Young, a veteran legal consultant at Zeughauser Group, said law firms in most major cities are requiring vaccinations and posited that it's likely clients in those cities are as well. But, she added, not every client is located in a major city, and not every major city has a robust vaccination rate. "There are certain cities in the southern United States where they never really closed down and sort of pretended like the virus doesn't exist. Those could be problematic," Young said.
IS REMOTE REASONABLE? - A former Morgan, Lewis & Bockius staff member sued the global law firm last week alleging that management refused her request to work from home after she suffered a stroke, despite mandating remote work for all employees a few months later during the pandemic. The lawyers for plaintiff Claire Young said the case raises questions about the legal obligations of employers to provide reasonable accommodations for Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act-protected groups in the era of COVID-19. Attorney Scott Pollins of Pollins Law, who is co-counsel for Young with David Koller of Koller Law, told Law.com's Justin Henry that their client's case is about "her desire to work through her challenging medical issues and how her employer thwarted her efforts to do so." Pollins said the case will also explore whether "remote work was just as much of a reasonable accommodation before the COVID-19 pandemic as it is now."
SUSPICIOUS STOCK SALES? - Fitness giant Peloton Interactive and certain officers and directors were hit with a shareholder derivative action Friday in New York Eastern District Court over the company's response to safety issues with its Tread+ device. The suit, brought by Weisslaw LLP, contends that Peloton insiders sold over 2 million shares of Peloton stock in the period before the safety incidents leading to the recall of the company's treadmills became public. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:21-cv-04583, Genack.v. Foley. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
|- How Quinn Emanuel's Silicon Valley Office Leader Is Paving the Way for the Next Generation of Lawyers By Zack Needles and Alaina Lancaster
- U.S. Finds Target on Night Vision Goggles + VoIP-Pal Tries Once More to Be Heard in Waco + Fish & Richardson Designs a Trial Win By Scott Graham
- Provide an Exceptional Client Experience to Grow Your Legal Practice By Darl Champion
- 'Court's Hands Are Tied': Judge Says Biden Admin's Latest Eviction Moratorium Can Survive for Now By Jacqueline Thomsen
- An Armored SUV, '60 Minutes' and CNN: Avenatti's Defense Draws on His Time in the Spotlight By Meghann M. Cuniff
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
KISS AND SAY GOODBYE - Allen & Overy London real estate finance partner Paul Flanagan has resigned from the firm after a video of him kissing and intimately touching a junior female colleague circulated over the summer, Law.com International's Rose Walker reports. A person familiar with the matter said the woman is a junior female member of staff at the firm. Legal blog Roll on Friday was the first to share the video publicly. According to one person with knowledge of the situation, when A&O management became aware of the video earlier in the summer they emailed all staff to acknowledge it and to state the behavior it depicted was unacceptable. A spokesperson for A&O said on Friday: "The video depicts inappropriate workplace conduct which is not in line with our Code of Conduct. The matter has been investigated and addressed in line with the firm's internal processes." Flanagan did not respond to requests for comment.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"As crypto companies grow, they need to be aware of the increased legal risk that comes with larger operations."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhich Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
4 minute readHow Big Law Congressional Investigation Practices Will Stay Busy in 2025
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250