Lawyer-Parents Stressed as Another Uncertain Fall Approaches: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
August 18, 2021 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
THE KIDS ARE ALRIGHT? - After enduring a full school year of their kids' Zoom classes, parents in Big Law (and everywhere else), were hoping for a return to normalcy this upcoming fall. Instead, they are once again stressing about child care, in-person school and whether or not it is safe to allow their children, many of whom are ineligible to be vaccinated, to attend. They're grappling with questions of social development, the ability to learn in a remote environment and, in some areas of the country, whether or not schools are safe. Law.com's Patrick Smith and Dylan Jackson interviewed several lawyer-parents to discuss their concerns and found that while they feel better equipped to handle pandemic-inspired situations such as shifting class schedules for their kids or a lack of child care options, planning for the future is murky and uncertain at best. One Big Law partner summed it up: "As delta has been spreading and catching fire, it feels like it is even harder than the first time around."
DATA DUMPED - It used to be that the few law firms that were disciplined about data management had a leg up on their competition. But as in-house expectations continue to shift, it may soon be the case that those firms that don't track internal data end up in the minority—and ultimately get left behind. At a time when in-house departments are under enormous budgetary pressure and are increasingly requiring some measure of pricing and matter outcome predictability from their outside counsel, it's imperative that firms are able to show, not tell, exactly how much value they're providing. Those that can't, run the risk of getting clipped. But what does all that actually mean? In this week's Law.com Trendspotter column, we look at some real world examples of the types of data clients crave, why they need it and how firms can provide it. Before we dive in, I'm interested to hear from you: Whether you're at a law firm or in-house, give an example of how data has enhanced the law firm-client relationship (or, perhaps, how a lack of data has harmed that relationship). Contact me at [email protected].
ALTERNATIVE FACTS - Holland & Knight filed a civil RICO lawsuit Tuesday in New York Southern District Court against Greenhouse Consultants and other defendants affiliated with the nonprofit Friends of the Fishkill Supply Depot. The suit accuses the defendants of mischaracterizing the historical significance of a 10.4-acre real estate parcel in Fishkill, New York in order to block its commercial development by the plaintiffs. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:21-cv-06931, Broccoli et al v. Ashworth et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
- Who's Got Your Back? How Mentorship Can Promote Real Inclusion and Retention By Samantha Joseph
- Drexel's Law School Revokes Giuliani's Honorary Degree By Aleeza Furman
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
RAPID REASSURANCE - With a burgeoning fourth COVID wave rolling across Canada, a handful of law firms are participating in a rapid screening program to provide another layer of safety for those going into the office, Law.com's Gail J. Cohen reports. The majority of Canadian law firms are holding steady with a hybrid model, at least until the end of the year. They want to ramp up the numbers of people in their offices while following local health guidelines, but they don't want to make vaccinations mandatory, so a number of firms have launched pilot programs using Creative Destruction Lab's Rapid Screening Program. CDL is a nonprofit organization founded by the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management. "We want to have the opportunity for people to be able to come back to the office and feel as safe as possible," Monique Jilesen, a partner at Toronto litigation boutique Lenczner Slaght, told Cohen. "Rapid screening, if it's available, just makes everyone more safe."
WHAT YOU SAID
"They are all released from prison, and they are hunting their judges down. The judges expect the Taliban will torture, kill them and their families."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOvercoming Hurricane Helene: How the Western North Carolina Legal Community Managed Court Closures, Sanitation Concerns
Hurricane Helene's Impact On Asheville, North Carolina: How Public and Private Attorneys Dealt With Closures, Safety and Sanitation
More Young Lawyers Are Entering Big Law With Mental Health Issues. Are Firms Ready to Accommodate Them?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
- 2Fried Frank Partner Leaves for Paul Hastings to Start Tech Transactions Practice
- 3Stradley Ronon Welcomes Insurance Team From Mintz
- 4Weil Adds Acting Director of SEC Enforcement, Continuing Government Hiring Streak
- 5Monday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250