10. It's Incredibly Easy to Lose the Trust of Clients - How to Avoid the Pitfalls
Taking assignments from clients is literally the opposite of taking candy from a baby. They are smart, savvy, connected and most of all, skeptical. This is why it's incredibly easy to lose the trust of clients.
August 26, 2021 at 08:47 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
Our series on trust started with a lesson called "Trust: Hard to Win, Easy to Lose, Impossible to Recover." That was focused on on how to build trust, and so now we turn to how to lose it, and the pitfalls to avoid. Taking assignments from clients is literally the opposite of taking candy from a baby. They are smart, savvy, connected and most of all, skeptical. This is why it's incredibly easy to lose the trust of clients. The first problem is that they are not naturally trustful or forgiving. GCs and other in-house clients are conditioned by experience to be wary of outside counsel. They all have horror stories, which they share liberally among themselves. Couple that with the fact that they have an ever-growing supply of alternative vendors and solutions.
It's helpful to look at this through the client lens. From the client standpoint, the trust issues which outside counsel have to navigate are around technical knowledge, judgement and operational skills. Each hurdle is harder to jump then the one before. Technical knowledge is often a given, and this is rarely where trust is lost. Even so, if you claim expertise outside your technical skill set, or sell what you have rather than what's needed, don't be surprised if the client loses trust. Judgment is bigger challenge. Clients are not only wary of counsel who make a bad call or a reach a judgement based on bad or incomplete information, but also those who sit on the fence for fear of error.
Then comes the biggest hurdle of all: operational skills. This is about our legal processes and how reliably we deliver the work. 'Legal Ops' is a credibility graveyard for outside counsel, so let's look at some of the pitfalls. As we've said, never take the wrong assignments, however much you need the hours. Then comes failure to understand and collaborate with the client at the get-go. If you don't agree to parameters and deliverables, you're in danger of over promising. This is big trust eradicator, not least because the GC is likely to convey your promise to the business and become shamed. Which leads neatly to the next pitfall. In everything you do, every day, for every client remember this; never embarrass the client. If you can navigate all those traps, the rest is down to efficient, effective and transparent lawyering. Our shorthand for this is 'lean' and you can avoid these traps and others by applying methods and tools from the Lean Law Program.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat Went Wrong With Adeel Mangi's Long, Strange Trip Through the Judicial Nomination Process?
6 minute readBCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Trump’s DOE Pick Could Spell Trouble for Title IX Enforcement, Higher Ed Funding
4 minute readProtecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'The Court Will Take Action': Judge Upbraids Combative Rudy Giuliani During Outburst at Hearing
- 2Attorney Sanctioned for Not Exercising Ordinary Care: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
- 3$1.9M Settlement Approved in Class Suit Over Vacant Property Fees
- 4Former Wamco Exec Charged With $600M 'Cherry-Picking' Fraud
- 5Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250