Are 'White Shoe' Firms Going Out of Style?: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
August 31, 2021 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Law Firms - LargeWant to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
IF THE SHOE DOESN'T FIT… - So according to Marie Claire magazine, you actually can wear white after Labor Day. Even so, as the holiday approaches, you may want to reconsider referring to your organization as a "white shoe" law firm. As Law.com's Patrick Smith reports, the term can still refer to the elite of the legal community working on the most important matters for the most impactful clients. But, for an increasing number of attorneys, "white shoe" symbolizes a way of working that is going extinct, conjuring images of antiquated and exclusory firms run by partners who all look like Mr. Monopoly. Some firms, like Milbank, for example, have actively tried to distance themselves from the label, which firm chair Scott Edelman told Smith "often connotes an old-fashioned firm that lacks diversity and fails to appreciate inclusiveness." Meanwhile, legal recruiter Alisa Levin told Smith the moniker also tends to send the message to younger potential hires that a firm is "too buttoned up." "When you think of white shoe firms, you think stodgy. You think of them representing old blue chip companies," she said. "A lot of attorneys want to work where they think it is 'cool.'"
CLINICAL TRIAL - Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes is headed to a San Jose courtroom for her criminal fraud trial starting today. The trial, which will center on the government's allegations that the former executive defrauded investors, doctors and patients with faulty blood-testing technology, is expected to last about 13 weeks in front of U.S. District Judge Edward Davila of the Northern District of California. Keep up with Law.com's coverage of the trial here. As Law.com's Dylan Jackson previously reported, the proceedings are likely to reopen an uncomfortable moment for Boies Schiller Flexner and its founder David Boies, who previously represented Holmes and also served as one of the company's directors. Before you dive into coverage of the trial itself, check out Alaina Lancaster's analysis of what other law firms can learn from Boies Schiller's involvement in the Holmes saga.
AGAINST THE GRAIN - Nestle Purina PetCare was slapped with a consumer class action Monday in Missouri Eastern District Court. The complaint, filed by Levin Sedran & Berman and other law firms, contends that Purina's "grain-free" food products are falsely advertised. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 4:21-cv-01075, Barker et al. v. Nestle Purina PetCare Co. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
|- Capitol Riot Cases at a 'Standstill' as John Pierce Goes MIA, and DOJ Refuses to Work With His Unlicensed Associate By Andrew Goudsward
- Who's Arguing? Big Hitters and Mega-Stakes Appeals Mark the Return of Full-Time In-Person Arguments at CAFC By Scott Graham
- U.S. Supreme Court Narrows Assignor Estoppel Doctrine In Continuation Patent Case By John Bowler and Kristie Butler
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
PROACTIVE PRO BONO - International law firms ramped up their efforts to assist with the evacuation and settlement of people pouring out of Afghanistan ahead of today's deadline for the withdrawal of U.S. troops, Law.com International's Anne Bagamery reports. Efforts have kicked into high gear in recent weeks with the fall of the Afghan government, but some of the work actually started months before. Over the summer, the International Refugee Assistance Program, or IRAP, engaged four law firms—Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, Davis Polk & Wardwell, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett—to draft brief reports on the conditions in certain countries to which Afghan nationals might flee in the event that the Taliban resumed control over Afghanistan. The firms are continuing to work with IRAP on additional reports, according to Simpson Thacher. And through previous initiatives to help refugees from Syria and other conflict zones, U.K. and European pro bono networks have projects underway in countries like Turkey and Greece that can be utilized to help with Afghanistan, lawyers said.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"It's sort of like asking for a pony. It isn't something you should expect to prevail on."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn a Texas Growth Surge, Paul Hastings Signs New Leases in Houston, Dallas
3 minute readEnergy Lawyers Expect Demand for Energy Work to Stay Steady Under Second Trump Administration
3 minute readSoutheast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250