Office Returns Could Remind Some Attorneys It's Time to Go: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
September 03, 2021 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
BACK TO REALITY - Law firm leaders itching to return to the office have talked up the need for folks to rekindle the deep affection they have for their colleagues and for their firm's culture. But what about those attorneys who walk through the suite doors for the first time in a year-and-a-half and realize, "Wait a second—I hate this place"? In this week's Law.com Barometer newsletter, American Lawyer Executive Editor Ben Seal writes that getting back to "normal" could be the catalyst for a young lawyer exodus at those firms where things like transparency, equity and flexibility have not been high priorities during the pandemic. "It won't be the result of a broad-scale refusal to take public transit back into all those high-rises—though that will motivate some people," Seal writes. "Instead, as firms and their lawyers seek to re-establish their culture and ways of operating, lawyers who have felt separated from it all for the past 18 months will be thrown back in. And at firms that haven't done what's necessary to keep them satisfied, they might realize it's time for a change." To receive the Law.com Barometer directly to your inbox each week, click here.
ANTIBODIES GUESS - According to the CDC, people should still get vaccinated against COVID-19 even if they've already been infected with the virus. But there are plenty of people who have recovered from COVID who think otherwise, and, as Law.com's Andrew Maloney reports, that could make things dicey for law firms. Amid a rise in employers requiring the vaccine, some in the legal industry are still grappling with how to handle claims that "natural immunity" should count as an exemption to vaccine mandates. "One of the issues that I think is going to be difficult for all employers [not just law firms], and one we are studying very carefully, is the issue many people are raising, which is—'I've had COVID once or twice, so I have automatic antibodies. So why do I need to get vaccinated when I already have the antibodies?'" Michael Heller, chair of Cozen O'Connor, told The American Lawyer last month after his firm implemented a vaccine mandate. But law firm consultant Kent Zimmermann told Maloney that, while the question of whether to mandate vaccines is "still very much a topic," most firms that have chosen to require the shot have settled into allowing for two general accommodations for people who refuse: health reasons and sincerely held religious beliefs. "But I haven't heard any say an exception to the mandate is if you've had COVID," he said. "Not one has said that to me."
TAKEN FOR A RIDE? - Chinese ride-hailing giant DiDi Global, Barclays, BofA Securities, Morgan Stanley and a slew of other defendants were hit with a securities class action Thursday in California Central District Court in connection with DiDi's June IPO. The suit, filed by Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, accuses DiDi and its underwriters of failing to disclose risks related to ongoing discussions with Chinese cybersecurity regulators. The case is 2:21-cv-07104, Hu v. DiDi Global Inc. et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
- Take Our Survey: Should the Term 'White Shoe' Be Canceled? By Patrick Smith
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
4 minute read
Georgia July Bar Exam Results: Highest Overall Passing Rate in 10 Years
Summer Associates Want Gen AI Training. Is Big Law Providing It?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
