11. AI Is the Friend You Didn't Know You Already Made
Artificial intelligence (AI) is more than just a buzzword. AI is powering many of the systems and apps we use every day. But what do lawyers think of it?
September 24, 2021 at 12:58 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
Artificial intelligence (AI) is more than just a buzzword. AI is powering many of the systems and apps we use every day. But what do lawyers think of it? The attitudes fall into two groups. One group really understands what AI is and believes it has a key role in the practice of law. The other group doesn't really understand what AI is and doesn't believe it has a key role in the practise of law. The first group contains clients, and the second group contains law firms. This is a crude over-generalization of course, but it has some validity. There is also a third group in the middle, which contains Chief Information Officers (CIOs) employed by law firms. These folks are smart, helpful and often under-used.
Maybe some lawyers still fear AI, with visions of Skynet from The Terminator films taking over the world. Let's clarify this picture and get to the real value of AI in a law firm. As we have discussed, clients actively expect law firms to embrace lean legal practice, they tell us that they have the same expectation of tech in general, and AI in particular. The good news is that AI and lean law practice go hand-in-hand. AI is a tool that can be used to improve processes and automate otherwise mundane tasks. It's not going to replace human workers, but it will replace tasks which are a time-suck and of little value to the client. This instantly explains the widespread client enthusiasm. Law firms have nothing to fear from this. The way to look at AI is as a creator of won-back time which can be spent on legal analysis, case strategy, client interaction, and many other tasks that lawyers enjoy and clients appreciate.
So how should law firms answer the increasingly common question from clients about whether they use AI? The good news is that they have a ready-made answer — yes, all the time. This is one of those rare but happy alignments where law firms are already doing the thing clients want without even knowing it. Truth is, lawyers are inundated with data from various sources — evidence, litigation data, legal source materials, practical guidance — and AI already sifts and prioritizes. But it can go way beyond that, and clients want it to. AI can not only streamline document reviews, it can help build the RFP response process by suggesting responses based on the request, and even predict the likelihood of success of that proposal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHaynes Boone, Hicks Thomas Get Dismissal of $1.3B Claims in 2022 Freeport LNG Terminal Explosion
3 minute readMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250