This Year's Summer Associates Relished In-Person Interaction: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
September 27, 2021 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
REAL GOOD TIME - Remote work may be enjoying overwhelming popularity, but remote fun is still no substitute for real-life human interaction. As Law.com's Dylan Jackson reports, the in-person events summer associate programs are known for—ballgames, concerts and elaborate lunches—came back this year (albeit in limited supply), and many summer associates relished the few chances they had to meet face to face. Roughly 2,900 of this year's summer associates among 71 Am Law 200 law firms responded to The American Lawyer's 2021 Summer Associate Survey, answering both multiple choice and open-ended prompts. While last year's programs were largely remote in the first few months of the pandemic, many law firms opted for a hybrid approach this year, including the return of some more traditional activities like Houston Astros games with the office, yacht parties and expensive New York dinners. Survey responses showed that firms' in-person programming heavily influenced summer associates' perception of their experience. "We finally had the chance to meet our fellow classmates, and it was also refreshing to be in an office again," said one New York-based summer associate at an Am Law 100 firm.
CONSUMED WITH CONCERN - A novel consumer protection ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and a recent Federal Trade Commission settlement have in-house counsel at consumer-facing companies and the corporate defense lawyers who represent them gearing up for battle. In the latest Law.com Litigation Trendspotter column, we examine how the Eleventh Circuit's controversial ruling in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services and the Federal Trade Commission's $6.4 million settlement with a group of cruise line defendants last week could result in major litigation headaches (or worse) for even those companies that are engaging in legitimate business practices.
COURT FIGHT - Taft Stettinius & Hollister filed a lawsuit Friday in Kentucky Western District Court on behalf of Joe Hand Promotions to enforce distribution rights for the 2020 Ultimate Fighting Championship match featuring Israel Adesanya and Yoel Romero. The suit pursues claims against the operators of Chasers restaurant in Lebanon, Kentucky, for allegedly airing the broadcast commercially without permission. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 3:21-cv-00603, Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. FPB Ventures, LLC et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
| |- 'Get Rid of the Scumbags': Trade Secrets Battle Between ChromaDex, Elysium Offers Rare Look Inside Major Life Science Companies By Meghann M. Cuniff
- How St. Mary's Law School Convinced the ABA to Approve First-Ever Remote JD Program By Victoria Hudgins
- Eleventh Circuit Chief Says Wait and See How SCOTUS Rules on Mississippi Abortion Ban By Katheryn Tucker
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
PAY ME NOW AND PAY ME 'LATERS - Associate salary wars are now a global affair. Linklaters has increased salaries for its newly-qualified associates by 7.5%, hitting new heights for junior pay among the U.K.'s elite Magic Circle U.K. firms, Law.com International's Hannah Roberts reports. The firm is set to pay its NQs £107,500 as well as a discretionary bonus, up from a figure of £100,000 which had put it on a par with key rivals Clifford Chance, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Allen & Overy and Slaughter and May. The pay increase will take effect starting November 1, 2021, according to a spokesperson for the firm. Salaries for trainee lawyers at the firm will remain at their current rate, a document on the firm's website shows, with first years taking home a salary of £50,000 and second years taking home £55,000. The latest increase is an additional boost to Linklaters NQ salaries after the firm restored its pre-pandemic NQ salary in July, which was set in 2019 and which stood at £100,000. In August 2020 the firm cut NQ salaries by 10% to £90,000 as part of its cost-saving measures during the pandemic.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"This is difficult lawyer work, because it often requires that we engage in status-quo-busting, game-changing work, which is not popular and certainly takes its toll on you emotionally; physically, even."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRising Varied Investment Products, Regulatory Activity Drive Demand in Investment Funds
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250