6. Collaboration Drives Trust - But Also Business
We hear stories from very successful law firms and lawyers about how collaborating with other firms has allowed them to develop very trusted relationships with clients such that the business kept flowing. But collaborating with other suppliers drives business for reasons even beyond the building of trust.
October 14, 2021 at 02:15 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
We often hear from GCs that they wish their law firms collaborated with each other to solve problems and develop efficient and effective approaches that best serve the client. This sounds ideal but is it practical? Law firms are competing for business and likely lawyers might wonder how such collaboration will actually result in more business.
Funnily enough, it actually does. We do hear stories from very successful law firms and lawyers about how collaborating with other firms has allowed them to develop very trusted relationships with clients such that the business kept flowing. But collaborating with other suppliers drives business for reasons even beyond the building of trust.
Imagine you get to that stage of your career when you are so secure financially, emotionally and intellectually, that you are not threatened by anything or anyone. That is the state of mind that makes you your most collaborative, right? Even if you're not there yet, you have had those moments. That is what clients are looking for. Because that makes for the conditions that give rise to the best thinking, the least barriers, the most diversity of ideas, the most creativity. This is your best self, and it's the most valued by clients.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
2 minute readLegal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
1 minute readHaynes Boone, Hicks Thomas Get Dismissal of $1.3B Claims in 2022 Freeport LNG Terminal Explosion
3 minute readMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Trending Stories
- 1Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 2'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
- 5Battle for Top Talent Accelerates Amid Profit and Demand Surge
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250