4. Horizon Scanning: Are Law Firms Really Doing It?
Law firms have tools at the ready that can be used to truly identify what's on the horizon; they just have to understand what clients are looking for. Clients want business advice that is tailored to their business and industry. So use the tools at your disposal.
October 22, 2021 at 01:21 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
We talk a lot in Lean Adviser about how it's not enough to specialize in an area of law, or even in an industry sector. Law firms need to go further and specialize in their clients and their businesses. But it's easy to misunderstand what this means. Specializing in the client doesn't mean just knowing its history or today's share price. What's valuable to clients is that you know their structures, processes, business strategies and where they're going. From that knowledge base, you can then do horizon scanning, in the sense that clients understand and appreciate it.
Horizon scanning can be defined as: the identification of emerging risks and threats. This includes spotting trends, anticipating developments and seeing around corners.
Recent surveys show that clients are not happy with the ability of their outside firms to conduct horizon scanning and provide proactive solutions to address the uncovered trends. GCs say that sending general memos to clients is not enough, it's not really horizon scanning, and indicates that those firms don't understand what horizon scanning is and how it can help their business.
Law firms have tools at the ready that can be used to truly identify what's on the horizon; they just have to understand what clients are looking for. As we've mentioned before in Lean Adviser, clients want business advice that is tailored to their business and industry. So use the tools at your disposal to provide:
- Trend Spotting: Use recent cases, research, and knowledge of the industry to come up with trends, potential opportunities and potential risks that lay ahead for your clients.
- Industry Activity: What are your client's competitors up to? What emerging technologies or innovations are happening? What potential risks do these emerging trends bring — both to the client and the industry at large? Keeping clients abreast of these can lead to strategy discussions about how the client wants to deal with them.
- Laws and regulations: Use recent decisions on key industry issues, and, maybe more importantly, unique issues within that industry. Is a ruling a "one-off" or have there been other similar rulings? If there are more than two rulings that go the same way, keep tracking to see if it develops into a trend. Keep up with legal articles to help identify trends.
Law firms have a big opportunity to focus on making horizon scanning a component of their service offering. This means making it a part of each client relationship, not an ad hoc add-on for a few. Horizon scanning is one of the major disconnects from what GCs want and what their outside law firms are providing. Closing that gap can earn trust and help solidify the firm's relationship with its clients.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Narrow Path Back From Disbarment: 'You Have to Really Want to Be a Lawyer Again'
5 minute readNew Jersey Law Journal Names Mike Zogby Office Managing Partner of the Year
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250