The Future of the Law Firm Office Is Still TBD: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
October 22, 2021 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
SPACE AGE - Offices! Can't live with 'em, can't live without 'em, right? First, the law firm office was essential, then it was obsolete, now… well, that's TBD at the moment. As Law.com's Ben Seal writes in this week's Law.com Barometer newsletter, flexible in-person work appears to be the new standard, and lawyers are returning to the office at a time when the market still hasn't caught up, leaving firms with attractive leasing options. As opportunities abound, the future of law firm space is being decided right now. But unless everyone ultimately decides to follow PwC onto Remote Island, corporate real estate will likely be on the upswing soon enough. "When that happens, much of the opportunity facing law firms right now will dry up," Seal writes. "Those who haven't yet acted could be forced to choose from a set of far less favorable options. In the next few months, expect the flurry of activity in this space to grow. And for those firms that haven't yet determined who they want to be when they get back to the office, or how they want the office to reflect that, it's time to start thinking." To receive the Law.com Barometer directly to your inbox each week, click here.
CREDIT CHECK - Clients and—in at least one instance—litigation funding companies are increasingly using their considerable leverage over law firms to create incentives and accountability around origination credit. Diversity, equity and inclusion experts agree that origination credit—specifically, how it's awarded to women and minority attorneys—is one of the most important factors law firms must consider in trying to improve their ability to keep diverse talent. But it's also one of the most mysterious and least tracked metrics in Big Law. As we explore in this week's Law.com Trendspotter column, a shift to more equitable and transparent methods for assigning origination credit are, like most institutional changes at law firms, going to require external pressures. I'm interested to hear what you think: What can law firms do to make their process for assigning origination credit more equitable and transparent? How can clients and others help keep firms accountable in that regard? Let me know at [email protected].
RECORDED STEALS? - Dickinson Wright filed a trademark infringement lawsuit on behalf of the Amar'e Stoudemire Foundation on Thursday in Florida Middle District Court arising from its "Each 1 Teach 1," a/k/a E1T1, youth basketball team. The suit takes aim at Steven S. Reece, a former program director for the foundation who was terminated for allegedly misappropriating grant money. Reece is accused of using E1T1 trademarks without permission to hold events and charge participation fees. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 6:21-cv-01766, Amar'e Stoudemire Foundation v. Reece. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
|- What Now? Lawyers Weigh In on Ahmaud Arbery Trial After Court Publishes Suppressed Filings Amid Jury Selection By Cedra Mayfield
- 10th Circuit: Despite Lawyer's 'Deliberately Dishonest' Conduct, Sanctions Were Overly Broad By Allison Dunn
- Judge OKs Admission of Expert in Legal Mal Suit But Warns Against 'Future Cavalier Failure to Comply' With Scheduling Orders By P.J. D'Annunzio
- California's Winter Bar Exam Will Be Held In Person, Supreme Court Says By Alaina Lancaster
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
MONEY MYSTERY - Law firms in Japan, India and Singapore are remaining curiously tight-lipped about their 2020 revenues, Law.com International's Jessica Seah writes in her Asia Legal Briefing. What gives? As Seah notes, some lawyers she spoke to alluded to the fact that clients aren't typically thrilled to hear how much their lawyers have profited off their hardship. But how do these jurisdictions (and their client expectations) differ from South Korea's? South Korea's Big Six firm Kim & Chang reported a 17% revenue leap, up seven spots to 53rd place on the Global 200. It's also reporting one of the highest RPL among its Asian counterparts. So where do Japanese, Indian and Singapore firms stand? Will we ever find out? Stay tuned! You can receive the Asia Legal Briefing in an email or read it here.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"When I said I would protect our people from partisan influence with respect to investigations and prosecutions, I meant that, and I continue to do that regardless of what side of the aisle is criticizing me for it."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute read‘What’s Up With Morgan & Morgan?’ Law, Advertising and a Calculated Rise
10 minute readConservative Boutiques That Backed Trump Reap Their Rewards
What Will Happen to the Nominees in Florida's Southern and Middle Districts?
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 2UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 3Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
- 46th Circuit Judges Spar Over Constitutionality of Ohio’s Ballot Initiative Procedures
- 5On The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250