Emojis Emerge as Litigation Game-Changers: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
October 25, 2021 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
ICONIC LITIGATION - Emojis aren't just a convenient way to communicate with people you don't actually feel like talking to. As Law.com's Cedra Mayfield reports, they can also make or break your case. Recently, emoji use has helped to establish liability against landlords and indict politicians. It's also aided in getting some cases dismissed. In August, for example, emoji-related evidence led to a New York employment discrimination suit getting tossed, and sanctions imposed against plaintiffs counsel. Allegations that the plaintiff's supervisor sexually harassed and then retaliated against her hinged on screenshots of text messages, which purportedly included the use of the now-well-known "heart eyes" emoji. Trouble was that the version of the emoji the plaintiffs claimed had been used did not even exist on that phone's operating system at the time of the alleged messages. Still, should you find yourself attempting to similarly dismantle a case involving alleged emoji use, you may find due diligence difficult. "When you're researching case law, most of the big research services do not have support when searching via emoji or other elements, only text," said attorney and electronic discovery expert Matthew Verga of Consilio, an e-discovery software company. "There's no way to even find easily all of the opinions or guidance or attempts in the past to interpret a particular symbol on the record."
WHERE TO NEXT? - After attracting Dentons, Kirkland & Ellis and Foley & Lardner within the last year, it's clear that Salt Lake City has emerged as the place to be for Big Law. But the quest for the next hot market never really ends, so law firm leaders and industry watchers are already on the hunt for more strategically synergistic cities (…I know. I'm so sorry for writing that). There is no consensus on which market that may be at the moment, though, as Law.com's Andrew Maloney reports, analysts have mentioned Boise, Idaho; Spokane, Washington; Miami; and Detroit in addition to the usual suspects like Raleigh/Durham and Charlotte, North Carolina. Of course, the desirability of a particular locale will (or at least should) depend on a firm's practice focus, client demand and overall strategy. "What firms who are thinking clearly are doing is they're aligning geographic priorities with strategic priorities, and they're going where the money is," said Kent Zimmermann, of Zeughauser Group. "So you've got to get the strategy straight first, then geography … I think for most firms in the U.S., step one is: in what area do you want to be a dominant player? Two, where's the demand in money?"
PUBLIC SERVICE - Dentons sued the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday in New York Southern District Court on behalf of Singapore-based blockchain developer Terraform Labs and its CEO Do Kwon. The suit accuses the agency of violating its own rules by publicly serving Kwon with a subpoena at the Mainnet 2021 cryptocurrency summit. The case is 1:21-cv-08701, Terraform Labs Pte Ltd. et al v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
|- Why Illinois Lawyers Keep Getting Caught Overcharging Clients By Allison Dunn
- How Edelson Ensures Diverse Attorneys Don't Feel Like a 'Cog in Someone's Machine' By Alaina Lancaster and Zack Needles
- Mask Confusion: Judge Starts Enforcing California Central District Mandate, 2 Months Later By Meghann M. Cuniff
- 'Shocking to Me': Investigative Reporter Lise Olsen Talks New Book About Judicial Misconduct By Jacqueline Thomsen
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
FOUR REAL - Law.com International Editor-in-Chief Paul Hodkinson recently spoke with Geoff Moore, managing partner of Irish heavyweight law firm Arthur Cox, about the rise of new competition for traditional law firms, a new hybrid working policy and what the key trends for independent firms now are. On that first point, in particular, Moore did not mince words, particularly with regard to the continued encroachment of the Big Four accounting firms into the legal space. "There is no doubt but that the Big Four have made serious inroads into the legal profession in recent years," Moore said. "The reality is that competitors emerge from various sources and the Big Four are another source. I believe that the business model at those firms is different to ours so they are competing in a different way and, in most cases, for different kinds of work. Our challenge is to communicate how law firms are different and focus on our competitive advantage."
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"They are not required to take what is a pair of blue jeans and try to turn it into a tuxedo. They bargained for a tuxedo, they paid for a tuxedo, and they are entitled to rip up this pair of blue jeans they got and lay a proper tuxedo, period."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute readLife, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
8 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250