Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
MORE EXPENSES, LESS TALENT – Associate salaries are growing throughout the market—but it may not yet be enough to keep turnover levels in check. Andrew Maloney dives into a report by Thomson Reuters finding that the law firm turnover rate was 13.8% over the past year. Firms also experienced a 7.2% bump in direct expenses in Q3 2021 compared to a year earlier, which was linked primarily to salary increases. If spending on talent remains high, and retention rates fail to budge, some firms could be in tougher financial straits in near future, leading to potentially more consolidations in the market. Still, there's some good news: client demand in Q3 2021 was up over 4.4% compared to the same quarter last year, according to the report.
WAIT, WHO IS PUSHING FOR AFAs? - Conventional wisdom is overrated. Take for example, alternative fee agreements (AFAs). Surely it's just legal departments pushing for those, right? Not exactly. As Frank ready explains, it may be law firms that are the driving force behind some of the growing number of AFAs in the market. The reasons are multifold, including firms looking to compete with ALSPs and the rise of law firms' own captive ALSPs. Firms may even see a diversity benefit behind having more AFAs and less billable hours.
GOOGLE AWAITS EU ANTITRUST RULING - Tomorrow, the General Court of the Court of Justice of the European Union will rule on whether Google has favored its own shopping service in its search results over its competitors. Linda Thomspon reports that the case has far reaching implications for a common business model in the tech sector known as self-preferencing, which is when a company uses its dominance in one market to enter another. The case at hand traces its roots back to Google's appeal of a €2.42 billion fine by the European Commision in 2017. Many other pending EU antitrust cases against tech giants such as Amazon, Apple and Meta (Facebook) also involve the practice of self-preferencing.
EDITOR'S PICKS
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Lawsuit Against Major Food Brands Could Be Sign of Emerging Litigation Over Processed Foods
3 minute read
Government Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute read
Law Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute read
4th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law Restricting Online Court Records Access
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
