Law Firm Management by Fear No Longer Flies: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
November 18, 2021 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
NOT-SO-HORRIBLE BOSSES - What's the matter with these kids today? Suddenly it's not OK to berate, intimidate, manipulate and humiliate young lawyers in the workplace? Apparently, as Law.com's Patrick Smith reports, that management style doesn't work anymore. Believe it or not, current partners and practice leaders say fear-based bullying tactics are counterproductive with younger generations of lawyers and do nothing to inspire loyalty at a time when attorneys are changing jobs like we used to change our clothes before the pandemic. But how's anyone supposed to learn the ropes in a "professional" and "supportive" environment? Turns out that putting a premium on transparency and (non-yelling) communication goes a long way toward creating one of those culture thingies you hear so much about. "It is about earning that respect," said Shayda Le, a partner at employment, labor and benefits law firm Barran Liebman in Portland, Oregon. "The partners now understand that if the associates don't respect you, they may still perform but they won't stick around."
ZOOMING THROUGH IT - Another surefire way to connect with younger generations at work is to pull out the occasional pop culture reference to prove that you're not a square. For example: Virtual litigation has 99 problems—but mediation ain't one! As Law.com's Jasmine Floyd reports, litigators and mediators say alternative dispute resolution seems to run just as smoothly on Zoom as in person, and they want to keep it that way. "Attorneys are able to get mediations settled quickly and efficiently," said former Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice Leah Ward Sears, now a partner with Smith Gambrell Russell in Atlanta. "I believe this esteemed resolution is certainly the future, and it can be done pretty effectively through online calls. It's certainly been a very important part of us keeping the justice system alive during the pandemic."
SOLD TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER - British auction house Christie's has agreed to sell Christie's International Real Estate to real estate brokerage firm @properties in a deal guided by Allen & Overy; Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; and Lathrop GPM. Financial terms were not disclosed. Chicago-based @properties was advised by Lathrop and a Gibson Dunn team led by partner Andrew Herman. Christie's was represented by Allen & Overy. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
|- New Report: These Two Non-T14 Law Schools Are Among Your Best Bets for Landing at an Am Law 10 Firm By Christine Charnosky
- Ethiopian Airlines Crash Site Memory Lingers for Plaintiffs' Lawyer as Case Against Boeing Reaches a Milestone By Katheryn Hayes Tucker
- Utah Appeals Court: Brief Investigative Detention Does Not Entitle Suspect to Miranda Warning By Allison Dunn
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
RETENTION TENSION - Apparently, money can't buy happiness, even in Australian dollars. As Law.com International's Christopher Niesche reports, several Australian law firms have increased lawyers' wages by 10% or even 15% this month, but recruiters question whether the rises alone will be enough to stem the tide of departures for competing firms and more lucrative overseas roles. Just like in the U.S., the market for legal talent in Australia is highly competitive, thanks in large part to M&A work. Unlike in the U.S., however, Australian firms also have to deal with some of the market's brightest young attorneys moving out of the country for work. "The demand for talent is fierce and demand is outstripping supply. Many Australian lawyers have gone overseas already this year and more will follow suit, especially to New York, California and London. More will follow suit next year putting a further squeeze on already stretched transactional teams," said Jonathan Walmsley, owner of legal recruitment firm Marsden Group.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"I think a lot of these lawsuits are a little bit of political theater. I think that's just the time that we're in right now."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute readLife, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
8 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250