12. Reliability, Not Relevance: We All Want To Be Relevant, But To Whom?
Law firm leadership sees an entire community of lawyers across the firm all trying to be relevant, and lawyers try to be relevant in their own firm. Maybe that's what a law firm is. But it's not collaborative, nor is it client facing, and for these reasons it entirely misses the point of relevance.
November 19, 2021 at 07:51 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
Have you ever noticed how hard lawyers work at being "relevant" within their firms? It's almost part of some unwritten handbook on survival as a lawyer: be relevant or be gone. There are multiple drivers and reinforcers for this, and many law firms encourage it. They do a good job spelling out what the firm needs, what it expects, and who sits in leadership positions. As a result, lawyers get pretty adept at understanding how to be relevant within the firm.
Human nature, being what it is, we shouldn't be surprised to see lawyers using this information to compete, tussle for attention and try to outshine each other. If somebody, somewhere in the law firm is setting your compensation and handing out assignments and leadership positions, you're going to want to know who that person is, what they need, and how to be relevant to them.
In turn, law firm leadership sees an entire community of lawyers across the firm all trying to be relevant. The being relevant season is almost upon us. This is when leaders get to review all the annual business plans and self-evaluation memos. This isn't a totally flawed system, and it's true that each of these lawyers is relevant in their own way. Maybe that's what a law firm is. But it's not collaborative, nor is it client facing, and for these reasons it entirely misses the point of relevance.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Longtime AOC Director Glenn Grant to Step Down, Assignment Judge to Take Over
4 minute read
Hours After Trump Takes Office, Democratic AGs Target Birthright Citizenship Order
4 minute read
Hicks Johnson Promotes Lori Arakaki and Daniel Scime to Firm Partnership
2 minute read
IAG Forensics & Valuation is excited to announce promotions at our firm effective 1/1/2025.
1 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
