Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.

WHAT WE'RE WATCHING

CAN'T QUIT YOU - Imagine if your doctor advised you to go on a diet, but your job required you to eat constantly. And if you stopped eating, even for a little bit, all the food in your fridge would fire you and hire someone else… OK, we've lost this metaphor. But the point is: after the past 18-plus months, lawyers badly need a mental health break from their cellphones, laptops and other electronic alerts. However, as Law.com's Victoria Hudgins reports, that's not an easy proposition for attorneys whose clients expect them to be reachable and responsive at all times. Still, Patrick Krill, founder of lawyer well-being consultancy Krill Strategies, believes legal professionals laying off their electronics for a bit is a worthy and necessary goal, albeit a tricky one to achieve. "In terms of being able to digital detox, you're confronted with this choice: Will I create a healthy boundary with my devices or am I going to be made constantly available to be seen as responsive? There's a clear tension there in the context of a profession where we are expecting or rewarding people based on their availability," Krill noted. So what can be done? Krill advises taking an incremental approach. "Try to reduce your usage, your scrolling, device checking by a small percentage and [go] from there," he suggests.

CAN'T BE SAVED - Well, it was fun while it lasted. In 2020, law firms banked significant profits after saving on travel, office costs, marketing, events and other expenses during the pandemic. But, as Law.com's Dan Roe reports, most of those line items—including attorney compensation costs, marketing expenses from conferences and events and cybersecurity spend—have surged back this year. Still, not every firm is willing now to return to a pre-pandemic business development budget. "Some of the things normally we as lawyers do with clients—dinners, lunches, presentations—a lot of that was put on hold in 2020. And I think we realized that, and our clients realized that, it's really about the relationships we have already in place," said Tripp Scott COO Paul Lopez. "We don't have to do as much wining and dining as we used to do, so we can focus on making sure our clients are taken care of."

CAN'T WIN? - Sidley Austin and Greenberg Traurig sued the U.S. Department of Justice on Tuesday in Rhode Island District Court on behalf of International Game Technology PLC and subsidiary IGT Global Solutions. The plaintiffs, which provide technology and management services to 37 state lotteries, challenge an Office of Legal Counsel opinion declaring that the Wire Act of 1961 applies to all forms of bets and wagers, including the online sale of lottery tickets. The case is 1:21-cv-00463, International Game Technology PLC et al v. Garland et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.  

EDITOR'S PICKS

Ohio Jury Finds CVS, Walmart and Walgreens Liable for Opioids Crisis in 2 Counties