Lacking Succession Plans, Midsize Firms Are Merging: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
December 02, 2021 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Succession Planning
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
FUTURE-PROOFING - The bad news is that succession planning has gotten a lot more difficult during the pandemic. The good news is that law firms have never been very good at it anyway, so not much has changed. Still, there remains the small matter of what to do if you don't want your firm to go the way of the buffalo after all the senior partners retire. As Law.com's Jessie Yount reports, a desire to secure leadership for the future is driving a number of midsize firms to resume merger talks and strike deals that were largely put on hold over the past 18-plus months. The pandemic further exacerbated the need for the next generation of law firm leaders, as management confronts obstacles related to the virus itself and how to return to the office. But another consequence of COVID is that baby boomers aren't the only ones leaving the profession, according to Kristin Stark, a law firm consultant at Fairfax Associates. "To complicate matters, the pandemic has reduced the partnership glue, which has previously held many partnerships together," Stark told Yount. "It has also led more partners to disengage from the practice of law prematurely through early retirements or a shift to other types of work. This instability in the partnership composition has further contributed to a feeling by some smaller and midsize firms that they need to join forces with a larger firm in order to remain viable and avoid dissolution."
PREPARING PROSPECTIVE PRACTITIONERS - In October, as Law.com's Avalon Zoppo reported, data released by the National Association for Law Placement showed that first-generation law school students are worse off in the job market after graduating compared to their peers who have at least one parent or guardian with a law degree. Recognizing that all law students should have equal access to the information needed to succeed in law school and beyond, a number of law firms are increasing their outreach aspiring attorneys, especially at Historically Black Colleges and Universities, Law.com's Dan Roe reports. But what should that outreach actually entail? Samendio Mathieu, a May 2021 graduate of the Florida A&M University College of Law who recently joined South Florida firm Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell as associate, told Roe that firms looking to engage law students on campus can fill educational gaps left by the law school curriculum. "Coaching moot court, doing mock trials, sponsoring a law review, would create regular interactions with law students and build familiarity," he said. "A lot of students don't have familiarity with attorneys actually practicing law unless their parents, family members, and friends were lawyers. Considering FAMU is an HBCU that's not the case for a lot of students."
MARRIOTT'S MISUSED MURAL? - Marriott International and the owners of two San Diego hotels were hit with a copyright infringement lawsuit Wednesday in California Central District Court. The lawsuit, brought by Erikson Law Group on behalf of Greetings Tour, accuses the hotel chain of using a photograph of the plaintiff's iconic "San Diego" mural to promote its regional hotels on social media. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 2:21-cv-09336, Greetings Tour Inc. v. Marriott International, Inc. et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
US District Judge Nominee Defends Temperament as Past Tweets Draw Ire From Republicans By Avalon Zoppo SCOTUS Conservatives Lean Toward Upholding Mississippi's 15-Week Abortion Ban By Marcia Coyle A Viral LinkedIn Post Births a New Legal Mentoring Organization By Dylan Jackson Arent Fox and Schiff Hardin to Merge, Creating a New Am Law 100 Powerhouse By Bruce Love Davis Polk White-Collar Star Kenneth Wainstein Reports $13.3M Partnership Share By Andrew Goudsward|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
GOING SMALL IN THE BIG APPLE - After 15 years, one of Canada's largest law firms is changing its cross-border strategy and dramatically downsizing its New York office, Law.com International's Gail J. Cohen reports. Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt is scaling back its New York team to four lawyers from 15 or 16 a year ago, shifting its New York focus to advisory work. Cross-border corporate and securities partner Rob Lando, who is licensed to practice in both New York and Ontario, is the new office managing partner. "After 15 years of [following] a full-scale transaction execution model, we looked at it and thought that on balance we would be better off to partner with U.S. firms going forward," Osler managing partner Doug Bryce told Law.com International. Osler originally opened its only American outpost as a strategic way to approach the U.S. capital markets, which "exercise such a powerful force of gravity on economies outside the U.S., and in Canada in particular," he said. But with the lease coming up on the firm's office space in The New York Times building, it was "a logical time in which to engage in a little bit of review," Bryce added. The plan to pivot the New York office has been in the works for a number of months and was discussed with the partners there well in advance, allowing them to "have a chance to figure out their futures," he said.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"Don't make business decisions based on emotion."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Training to Replace Yourself': Kessler Topaz Co-Founder Set to Retire
5 minute readThe 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
9 minute read'Clear the Runway': Bill Lee's Longtime Focus on Succession Planning
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250