11. Want Success? Prioritize People Over Process
The legal industry is one of service, with nothing to sell but our people and how they apply their talent to solve client problems. For understandable reasons, law firms use legacy terms like 'capacity management' 'human capital' and 'human resources.' But if the talent wars have taught us anything, it's that humans aren't resources.
January 05, 2022 at 08:56 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
It would be fair to say that the legal profession has had an awkward relationship with diversity. For many decades, diverse lawyers have faced high thresholds and other artificial barriers to entry. Over time, things eventually started to change, and the concepts of diversity and inclusion were introduced, appreciated and adopted. Even then, it is often noted that law firms and departments were better at hiring than retention, and better at inclusion than integration.
Despite this accelerated progress, the profession clearly has not completed its journey. If it were otherwise, law firms and departments wouldn't incorporate diversity teams, or monitor hiring, retention and attrition.
In all this, perhaps we've been asking the wrong question the entire time. Maybe the issue isn't about how the legal profession handles diversity, maybe it's about how we handle people. After all, we are a service industry with nothing to sell but our people and how they apply their talent to solve client problems. For understandable reasons, law firms use legacy terms like 'capacity management' 'human capital' and 'human resources.' But if the talent wars have taught us anything, it's that humans aren't resources.
The lawyers who make up the (hopefully) diverse roster are people, and the complex challenge of handling them is not met by delegation to an HR department. It is a leadership issue, and it calls for behaviors which don't come naturally to law firm leaders, and soft skills which they mostly don't have.
In this and subsequent lessons, we'll break the discussion into the four phases of a career within a firm or department: 1) hiring; 2) inclusion; 3) support; and 4) retention. In this series we'll hear perspectives, stories and best practices from GCs, and also from outside professionals with fresh insights. But for now, let's lay out the behaviors and the associated soft skills which will be called for throughout our discussion.
Key Behaviors | Soft Skills | |
1. | Be involved | Inclusive leadership |
2. | Be accessible | Emotional intelligence |
3. | Give support | Empathy |
4. | Give recognition | Compassion |
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Narrow Path Back From Disbarment: 'You Have to Really Want to Be a Lawyer Again'
5 minute readNew Jersey Law Journal Names Mike Zogby Office Managing Partner of the Year
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250