Legalweek New York 2022 Postponed to March 8-11 Due to COVID-19
Under the new schedule, the Legalweek New York conference's sessions will begin on Tuesday, March 8, at the New York Hilton Midtown with the Exhibit Hall opening on March 9.
January 05, 2022 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
Conferences Seminars and Trade ShowsLegalweek New York will be returning in person in 2022 after a year virtual, but the wait will now be a bit longer due to the pandemic and the rise in cases from the Omicron COVID-19 variant. Today, ALM announced that its 2022 Legalweek New York event, originally scheduled to take place Jan. 31 through Feb. 3, will be postponed to March 8-11.
Under the new schedule, the conference's sessions will begin on Tuesday, March 8, with the Exhibit Hall opening on March 9. The Legalweek Leaders in Tech Awards will take place the evening of Thursday, March 10, and the conference will wrap up on Friday, March 11. The event will still be taking place at the New York Hilton Midtown.
A spokesperson in the events division of ALM told Law.com that the company does not anticipate major changes to Legalweek's structure and event schedule with this change, and noted the company "is working with our speaking faculty and sponsor partners to produce the best program possible with the faculty that have already committed to participating in the 2022 program."
(Editor's Note: ALM is also the parent company of Law.com and Legaltech News, though its events division is separate from its editorial division.)
Those looking to modify or cancel their reservation due to a conflict with the new dates can email [email protected] with their request, and ALM "will either transfer their registration to 2023 at no charge, work with them to find a replacement attendee or cancel their registration altogether," the spokesperson said.
ALM added that those who have already booked to stay in the New York Hilton Midtown through ALM's hotel block during the original dates will have their reservations canceled, and will need to re-book for the new dates by either contacting the hotel or using the link on the Legalweek New York website.
The spokesperson noted that the date change happened relatively quickly, given the rapid onset of the Omicron COVID-19 variant and the recent surge in cases worldwide. ALM and its partners began exploring alternatives over the holidays, with the date change only recently finalized.
The press release announcing the news noted the later date will "allow Legalweek to implement additional precautions to ensure the safety and comfort of the 8,000+ legal professionals that will gather." While there are not currently specifics for what those precautions will entail, the company noted it is working with the Hilton "to ensure that we are following the latest COVID recommendations and guidelines for safe, in-person gatherings, which continues to evolve as we learn more," according to the spokesperson.
Ultimately, ALM's hope is that the delay will allow more attendees to gather in-person and an overall safer experience.
"With the current increase in COVID cases worldwide, ALM has made the prudent decision to shift Legalweek to March," said Mark Fried, chief financial officer and president, events at ALM, in the release announcing the change. "This additional time will allow ALM to provide the experience that participants have come to expect from Legalweek, in a safe and comfortable environment. We are all looking forward to being back together again, in-person, to network, learn and engage with each other, and this shift in dates will ensure we are able to do just that."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Don't Know Everything': GCs Say Success Leading Nonlegal Functions Starts With Humility
5 minute read'The Unheard of Superpower': How Women's Soft Skills Can Drive Success in Negotiations
The GC as Geopolitical Soothsayer: How to Help Boards and C-Suites Connect the Dots
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250