Many Firms Are Too Confident About Their Cybersecurity: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
January 07, 2022 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
SEE YOU AT THE CROSSROADS - Over the past two years, law firms have surprised many a naysayer by demonstrating a previously unseen ability to adapt to extreme circumstances and unanticipated challenges. But 2022 could be the true test of whether this notoriously change-averse segment of the industry has any appetite for true, lasting transformation. In our first Law.com Trendspotter column of 2022, we're examining how law firms' approaches to talent acquisition and retention are poised to fundamentally change forever—or, y'know, not. The pandemic still appears to be far from "over" (whatever that means), but we're reaching a point at which law firms must decide whether they want to attempt to "get back to normal" (whatever that means) or embrace a new normal. For large firms, in particular, exhibiting a resistance to change at this crucial moment could cost them talent. But will it? That largely depends on what happens to the power balance between firms and talent in 2022.
FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY - Like the ever-mutating coronavirus, cybersecurity threats have been evolving since the beginning of the pandemic. What worked last year may now not be enough to ward off infection as cyber scams become harder to detect and more sophisticated. As Law.com's Rhys Dipshan writes in this week's Law.com Barometer newsletter, while law firms have been expanding training, rolling out secure devices and VPNs, and investing more in cybersecurity resources since early 2020, their security posture still faces glaring gaps. And far from being cognizant of their shortcomings, many are overconfident in their ability to weather the storm. To receive the Law.com Barometer directly to your inbox each week, click here.
UNFAIR GAME? - A former GameStop executive filed a whistleblower retaliation lawsuit against the company Thursday in Texas Northern District Court. Bruce Kulp, who is represented by Smyser Kaplan & Veselka, accuses GameStop of firing him to prevent the disclosure of negative information regarding the financial impact of increased shipping costs. Kulp, who served as GameStop's senior vice president of supply chain for more than a decade, claims that he was fired in late 2020 after preparing an analysis of the issue for GameStop's board of directors. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 4:22-cv-00012, Kulp v. GameStop Corp. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
ILL-SUITED? - Just 35% of 600 large global companies' legal and risk leaders feel fully confident in how prepared they are to face litigation this year, as regulatory pressures continue to ramp up globally, Law.com International's Hannah Walker reports. A report by Baker McKenzie has found that only 35% of companies with an annual revenue over $500 million based in the U.K., U.S., Singapore or Brazil feel totally confident in their preparedness to tackle litigation, with the figure dropping to just 14% in the U.K. The firm surveyed senior legal and risk leaders at the organizations for the report, which also found high levels of nervousness about a perceived high risk of external investigations from regulators and law enforcement agencies. Of the global respondents, 82% said they are experiencing concern over the issue, while 65% also worried about internal investigations, according to the report.
WHAT YOU SAID
"My advisor, who was a professor, introduced himself and asked me, 'Why are you taking the seat of a man who will use this to make a living?'"
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250