COVID Court Cancellations Cause Consternation: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
January 12, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
COVID, COURT CANCELLATIONS AND CARDI B - Earlier this week, we told you about how a number of courts across the country have once again been forced to cancel in-person proceedings thanks to the rise of omicron. What we didn't get into, however, is just how much of a pain all this stopping and starting has been for litigators and their clients. For example, Monica Latin, managing partner at Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, told Law.com's Meghann Cuniff that her trial team was already settled into its hotel on Friday afternoon when a call came in that the jury trial set to begin Monday in an Austin, Texas, courtroom had been called off because of the region's rising COVID-19 infections. "It's like putting the racehorse into the starting gate and then calling off the race," Latin said, but added that "[i[t's impossible to second-guess any of these decisions under these circumstances." The last-minute cancellations are also agonizing for clients—well, some clients. "It is very important to our client that this case gets to trial without any more delays," said Lawrence J. Conlan of Cappello & Noël in Santa Barbara, who's suing rapper and songwriter Cardi B for copyright infringement. "Cardi has been trying to avoid trial with us for some time now, using a lot of excuses that don't add up."
FACE LITIGATION - A federal judge on Tuesday ruled the FTC's amended antitrust lawsuit against Meta (née Facebook) can move forward, determining the commission overcame many of the legal issues that doomed its initial complaint last year, Law.com's Andrew Goudsward reports. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg of the District of Columbia said the FTC, in its refiled complaint, laid out enough facts about Facebook's market power in the personal social networking space to constitute an antitrust case. The commission alleged that Facebook not only has a monopoly, but has actively maintained that status by acquiring potential competitors like Instagram and WhatsApp. Boasberg said the FTC's allegations are "far more robust and detailed" than in its initial complaint, which Boasberg dismissed last June, "particularly in regard to the contours of the defendant's alleged monopoly." The decision is a victory for the FTC and its chair, Lina Khan, who has made cracking down on large technology companies a major goal for the agency.
HEEL TURN? - Kasowitz Benson Torres filed an antitrust lawsuit Tuesday in California Northern District Court against World Wrestling Entertainment. The partially redacted complaint was brought on behalf of competing wrestling company MLW Media, which accuses the WWE of "poaching" talent, misappropriating confidential information and airing MLW footage without permission. MLW also contends that the WWE uses intimidation tactics to interfere with competitors' contracts, such as MLW's recent broadcasting agreement with Vice TV, and streaming agreement with Tubi of Fox Corp. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 3:22-cv-00179, MLW Media LLC v. World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
TECH TO EXPECT - From devising ways to tackle the increasing complexity of data security to improving professional development in a hybrid work environment, experts from across the U.K. legal sector envision major legal tech developments on the horizon in 2022, Law.com International's Jack Womack reports. One of the most interesting shifts in the landscape this year could come in the form of law firms figuring out how to utilize legal tech to do more than simply work faster and cheaper. "We've already seen a shift away from maximum efficiency being the primary motivator for technological advancement," said Christopher Tart-Roberts, head of the lawtech group at Macfarlanes: "Reducing time spent and increasing value for money are still very important drivers, and rightly so. However, tech advancement can also deliver value in a much wider sense. The opportunity for law firms to offer a range of complimentary products and services which bring together law + tech, and that satisfy the expectations of increasingly tech-savvy clients, is particularly exciting."
WHAT YOU SAID
"Take every opportunity and don't be afraid to step outside of your comfort zone. By taking on new challenges, I was able to advance in my career earlier than I ever would have expected."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChicago Law Requiring Women, Minority Ownership Stake in Casinos Is Unconstitutional, New Suit Claims
5 minute readEighth Circuit Determines No Standing for Website User Concerned With Privacy Who Challenged Session-Replay Technology
7 minute readFree Microsoft Browser Extension Is Costing Content Creators, Class Action Claims
3 minute readDivided State Supreme Court Clears the Way for Child Sexual Abuse Cases Against Church, Schools
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Retired NY Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman Playing Key Role in Advancing 'Weinstein Bill'
- 2How I Made Partner: 'Take Every Opportunity to Get Involved in the Business Side of the Firm,' Says Alyssa Domzal of Ballard Spahr
- 3People in the News—Feb. 5, 2025—Eckert Seamans, Rawle & Henderson
- 4Librarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims
- 5Choice-of-Law Issues as the UCC 2022 Amendments Come into Effect
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250