14. Are You Equipping and Supporting Your Associates Properly?
Associates aren't just fee-earners, they are also people, and they get thrust into a job which is stressful and challenging. If they don't like it, or if the environment next door looks brighter, they'll leave. The armor which associates need, on a daily basis, isn't real estate, restitution or even restrictive covenants, it's resilience.
January 28, 2022 at 08:17 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
In the last lesson on 'people' we discussed what associates want, and what inclusion means to them. In this lesson, we zone in on just one part of inclusion, because it is so key to associate retention. It is this — are you equipping and supporting your people properly?
Joining a law firm is analogous to joining an army. New recruits may have an abundance of enthusiasm, but let's not forget they will be entering a hostile operating environment, for which they are largely unprepared. This is not lost on law firms. Leaders don't assume that the associates they hire are fully functional out of the box. It is understood that they are a work-in-progress. Associates come armed with a broad academic knowledge, that's a given, and then law firms add the two more ingredients, sector specialization and best practice mentoring. That's fine and it's true, but it's also incomplete. Law firms are now realizing that all these qualities, essential though they be, are not enough. Why, because associates aren't just fee-earners, they are also people, and they get thrust into a job which is stressful and challenging. If they don't like it, or if the environment next door looks brighter, they'll leave. The armor which associates need, on a daily basis, isn't real estate, restitution or even restrictive covenants, it's resilience.
As we discuss in Lean Adviser, a significant part of the problem is the inadequate training which associates get before joining law firms. Law schools teach students what the law is, not how to practice it the way clients want. This key survival skill is painfully acquired through trial and error over many decades. If this all took place in a nurturing, passive environment it would be stressful enough, but it doesn't. The competitive nature of private practice compounds the issue.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
Pa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250