The Technical Difficulties of Law Firm Mergers: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
February 08, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Law Firm Mergers
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
TAKE A HIKE - Each year, associate pay climbs higher and law firms' rates follow closely behind. And each year, industry watchers wonder whether clients will finally get fed up enough to actually push back. But if there is to be any kind of wide-scale reckoning over rate hikes, it hasn't come yet. And, at least according to some experts, there are no real signs that it's impending, despite the pandemic ratcheting up budget pressures for in-house departments. As we explore in the latest Law.com Trendspotter column, while clients make no secret of their irritation at the law firm talent war and its attendant costs, associate salary bumps continue and more rate hikes are expected this year. But while there's unlikely to be a mass uprising by corporate America in response to ballooning legal bills, clients do have ways to signal to their outside counsel that enough is enough. If/when they do, the message will likely have less to do with price than it does with value. I'm interested to get your thoughts: Are clients' criticisms of associate pay raises (and the attendant rate increases) fair? If so, what can/should in-house counsel be doing to make their disapproval clear? Let me know at [email protected].
UNTANGLING TIE-UP TECH - Law firm mergers are a little like when couples first move in together, albeit on a much grander scale. "What are we supposed to do with two air fryers?" becomes "what are we supposed to do with two case management systems?" As Law.com's Dan Packel reports, interviews with leaders at three law firms that recently absorbed smaller shops made clear that some degree of disruption is inevitable when combining the IT systems and related operations of two discrete businesses, particularly since it's impossible to get a full view of how the mechanisms will fit together until a combination is finalized. When done right, the lawyers are the ones who are least affected—but that means getting critical buy-in from the people who will actually be using this stuff. "It's often the staff that's going to have the toughest time with the transition," said Dinsmore & Shohl IP department chair and finance committee chair Josh Lorentz, who helped facilitate the firm's merger with 47-attorney Wooden McLaughlin at the start of 2021. "Lawyers serve the clients the same way, clients interact with lawyers the same way, but the staff that handles the internal systems, that's where the heartburn comes for having to integrate the two teams."
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Wag Labs Inc., a pet service marketplace platform, is going public via SPAC merger with CHW Acquisition Corp. As a result of the merger, Wag! Group Co. will be listed on the Nasdaq with a post-transaction equity value of approximately $350 million. The transaction, announced Feb. 3, is expected to close by the second quarter of 2022. San Francisco-based Wag Labs is advised by Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton. CHW, which is based in New York, is represented by a McDermott, Will & Emery team led by partners Ari Edelman and Harold Davidson. Read the press release on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
CAN'T KEEP MEETING LIKE THIS - Biogen, a biotechnology company specializing in therapies for neurodegenerative diseases, and certain of the company's executives were hit with a securities class action Monday in Massachusetts District Court. The lawsuit, brought by Block & Leviton, accuses the defendants of engaging in back-channel meetings with Billy Dunn, Office of Neuroscience chief for the Food and Drug Administration, in an effort to gain approval for Aduhelm, a drug meant to treat Alzheimer's disease that had already failed to obtain approval. The complaint asserts that these meetings are now being investigated by the federal government. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:22-cv-10200, Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System v. Biogen Inc. et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
UVA Law Launches 'First-of-Its-Kind' Comprehensive Pipeline Program By Christine Charnosky Appellate Court: Attorneys Representing Labor Union Can't Be Sued Over Untimely Arbitration Demand By Allison Dunn Attorney's $12K Sanction Can't Be Wiped Out in Bankruptcy, Appeals Court Rules By Avalon Zoppo Kavanaugh, Kagan Exchange Sharp Words in Alabama Voting Rights Case By Marcia Coyle'Non-White': How a Clerk's System for Sorting Jurors Affected Hundreds of Trials in a Texas County
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250