Office Returns Losing Their Luster Post-Omicron: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
February 10, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
HOME IS WHERE THE HEART IS - Perhaps realizing they can also have snacks and wear jeans at home, fewer law firm personnel than ever want to return to the office for more than a day or two per week, according to new data from Major, Lindsey & Africa. As Law.com's Patrick Smith reports, the legal recruiting firm conducted a follow-up flash survey to its "Lawyers' Perspectives on Returning to the Office" survey released in 2021 and found that the desire to be in the office has declined fairly significantly in less than a year. Just 27% of respondents want to be in the office three or four days a week, the survey found last month. That's down from 46% just 10 months earlier. Still, 75% of respondents said they would like to be in the office at least one day per week—they just don't see the office as a primary work destination. Stephanie Biderman, a partner in the associate practice at MLA and a co-author of the survey, said making the office experience worth the commute should be paramount in any hybrid work plan. "You have to just give both associates and partners some level of independence on what is best for them and their team," she said. "Firms have to make time in the office more valuable. Training, mentorship, positive cultural events and team-building events. That is where the focus is going to have to be." We want to hear from you on this topic. Click here to take Law.com's readers' poll on post-omicron office returns.
DOUBLE DUTY - GCs are increasingly taking on HR chief titles as their roles expand beyond the legal department. But while these dual roles often make sense in theory, they can make for a dicey balancing act in practice. "When you finally get to that dual role, it is really hard to do both because they're both such big roles," Mira Wolff, a veteran GC and HR chief, told Law.com's Phillip Bantz. "It's a move that's not without its risks and those need to be weighed very carefully," legal department consultant Jason Winmill added. "If there happens to be a major legal crisis, and also a crisis within their new realm of responsibilities, that can be dangerous." Regardless, there are no signs that legal department leaders' workloads will be lessening any time soon. "The pandemic highlighted a GC's versatile skills and broad operational muscle to manage quickly evolving COVID requirements and impact," Jessica Nguyen, GC for Seattle-based contract and data management tech startup Lexion, told Bantz. "Now that the cat is out of the bag about a broader scope that a GC can handle well, I expect the GC workload to remain the same or grow."
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - UPS has retained attorney Elizabeth "Lisa" Brown of GBG LLP to fend off a pending collective employment action. The suit, filed Nov. 9 in California Northern District Court by the Iscandari Law Group and Varlack Legal Services, accuses UPS of gender and age discrimination by not promoting female workers over the age of 40. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton, is 4:21-cv-08722, Goins et al v. United Parcel Service Inc et al. Read the complaint on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
FULL TILT - Apple was hit with a consumer class action Wednesday in California Northern District Court over its iPad Mini 6. The lawsuit, brought by Bursor & Fisher, contends that the liquid crystal display in the iPad Mini 6 is prone to "screen tearing," which allegedly makes texts and images appear to be tilted downward on one side. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 5:22-cv-00845, Bryan v. Apple Inc. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
5th Circuit Judge Gregg Costa to Return to Private Practice, Saying He's 'Better Suited to Being an Advocate' By Avalon Zoppo Federal Judge Tosses Personal Injury Firm's Challenge to Law Sealing Med-Mal Decisions By Allison Dunn How I Made Firmwide Chair: 'The Crucible of the Pandemic Gave Me Exposure to the Entire Firm,' Says Gwendolyn Prothro Renigar of Steptoe By Tasha Norman Appeals Court Upholds Sanction Against Lieff Cabraser for Misrepresentations in Fee Application By Nate Robson After Months of Delay, Kramer Levin Complex Litigation Chair Confirmed as Navy GC By Bruce Love|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
GET BACK - Here's hoping the 27% of respondents to Major Lindsey's survey who said they'd like to be back in the office three or four days a week all happen to work at Kirkland & Ellis. As Law.com International's Rose Walker reports, the global firm has announced in an internal memo that all of its attorneys and staff will be expected to return to their offices for three days each week beginning March 29. Kirkland chair Jon Ballis informed all firmwide personnel that beginning March 29, "we will move to a hybrid workplace model where attorneys and staff will be expected to be present in the office on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday." Ballis added in the memo: "We consciously selected a date several weeks away to ensure that we would not need to delay this date any further, and to allow people to plan accordingly. In-person activities such as practice group meetings, training, social and engagement events will occur on our in-office days."
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"Yes, I have concerns that we might be in crisis. As norms in the nomination process are broken, as more senators, local politicians and media question the legitimacy of the court, many of them heap scorn on the court. The threat [to judicial independence] is greater and unprecedented than at any time in our history."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Ease Partner Pay Tensions, Some Law Firms Are Seeking 'Middle Ground' in Transparency
5 minute readRed Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
5 minute readBaker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
2 minute readStars and Gripes: Merging Firms Need a ‘Superstar Culture’ for US Success
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250