Office Returns Losing Their Luster Post-Omicron: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
February 10, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
HOME IS WHERE THE HEART IS - Perhaps realizing they can also have snacks and wear jeans at home, fewer law firm personnel than ever want to return to the office for more than a day or two per week, according to new data from Major, Lindsey & Africa. As Law.com's Patrick Smith reports, the legal recruiting firm conducted a follow-up flash survey to its "Lawyers' Perspectives on Returning to the Office" survey released in 2021 and found that the desire to be in the office has declined fairly significantly in less than a year. Just 27% of respondents want to be in the office three or four days a week, the survey found last month. That's down from 46% just 10 months earlier. Still, 75% of respondents said they would like to be in the office at least one day per week—they just don't see the office as a primary work destination. Stephanie Biderman, a partner in the associate practice at MLA and a co-author of the survey, said making the office experience worth the commute should be paramount in any hybrid work plan. "You have to just give both associates and partners some level of independence on what is best for them and their team," she said. "Firms have to make time in the office more valuable. Training, mentorship, positive cultural events and team-building events. That is where the focus is going to have to be." We want to hear from you on this topic. Click here to take Law.com's readers' poll on post-omicron office returns.
DOUBLE DUTY - GCs are increasingly taking on HR chief titles as their roles expand beyond the legal department. But while these dual roles often make sense in theory, they can make for a dicey balancing act in practice. "When you finally get to that dual role, it is really hard to do both because they're both such big roles," Mira Wolff, a veteran GC and HR chief, told Law.com's Phillip Bantz. "It's a move that's not without its risks and those need to be weighed very carefully," legal department consultant Jason Winmill added. "If there happens to be a major legal crisis, and also a crisis within their new realm of responsibilities, that can be dangerous." Regardless, there are no signs that legal department leaders' workloads will be lessening any time soon. "The pandemic highlighted a GC's versatile skills and broad operational muscle to manage quickly evolving COVID requirements and impact," Jessica Nguyen, GC for Seattle-based contract and data management tech startup Lexion, told Bantz. "Now that the cat is out of the bag about a broader scope that a GC can handle well, I expect the GC workload to remain the same or grow."
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - UPS has retained attorney Elizabeth "Lisa" Brown of GBG LLP to fend off a pending collective employment action. The suit, filed Nov. 9 in California Northern District Court by the Iscandari Law Group and Varlack Legal Services, accuses UPS of gender and age discrimination by not promoting female workers over the age of 40. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton, is 4:21-cv-08722, Goins et al v. United Parcel Service Inc et al. Read the complaint on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
FULL TILT - Apple was hit with a consumer class action Wednesday in California Northern District Court over its iPad Mini 6. The lawsuit, brought by Bursor & Fisher, contends that the liquid crystal display in the iPad Mini 6 is prone to "screen tearing," which allegedly makes texts and images appear to be tilted downward on one side. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 5:22-cv-00845, Bryan v. Apple Inc. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
GET BACK - Here's hoping the 27% of respondents to Major Lindsey's survey who said they'd like to be back in the office three or four days a week all happen to work at Kirkland & Ellis. As Law.com International's Rose Walker reports, the global firm has announced in an internal memo that all of its attorneys and staff will be expected to return to their offices for three days each week beginning March 29. Kirkland chair Jon Ballis informed all firmwide personnel that beginning March 29, "we will move to a hybrid workplace model where attorneys and staff will be expected to be present in the office on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday." Ballis added in the memo: "We consciously selected a date several weeks away to ensure that we would not need to delay this date any further, and to allow people to plan accordingly. In-person activities such as practice group meetings, training, social and engagement events will occur on our in-office days."
WHAT YOU SAID
"Yes, I have concerns that we might be in crisis. As norms in the nomination process are broken, as more senators, local politicians and media question the legitimacy of the court, many of them heap scorn on the court. The threat [to judicial independence] is greater and unprecedented than at any time in our history."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSullivan & Cromwell Signals 5-Day RTO Expectation as Law Firms Remain Split on Optimal Attendance
Many LA County Law Firms Remain Open, Mobilize to Support Affected Employees Amid Historic Firestorm
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250