Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
DO YOU REALIZE?? - Large law firms did a better job collecting their bills last year, contributing to one of the strongest years on record in the legal industry. And along with an uptick in Big Law's realization rate came a realization for Big Law: getting paid is better than not getting paid. As Law.com's Andrew Maloney reports, whether firms have any room to once again improve realization this year partly depends on demand during the rest of the pandemic. But there are also variables they can control, analysts and law firm leaders said, such as practice mix, leverage, billing and collection discipline, and client relationship management—all of which could nudge realization upward. "I do think there is opportunity there still," said Gregg Eisenberg, managing partner of Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff. Big Law boosted its realization by an average of 2.1% last year, according to the latest analysis by Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group. Although 2021 saw a demand spike that created less discounting pressure, according to Citi's analysis, Eisenberg noted some firms fall off on realization because there is a "disconnect" between them and their clients, and that project management and working collaboratively help buoy that rate, in part by eliminating surprises. "You just have to make sure you have a meeting of the minds there on what things should cost," he said.
WELL 'VERSED - Arent Fox may be the first Big Law firm to buy land and start building an office in the metaverse, but, as Law.com's Bruce Love reports, other firms were pioneers of virtual reality dating at least as far back as 16 years ago. In 2006, Hogan Lovells precursor Lovells opened up shop in Second Life, a forerunner to today's metaverse. And late last year, a boutique personal injury firm built an office in the metaverse designed by the 11-year-old daughter of one of the partners. But why? According to those that have made the leap, a major factor in the decision was the ability to demonstrate to cutting-edge clients that the firm is fluent in the tech. Chris Hinze, who was head of corporate communications at London firm Lovells when it entered Second Life, said clients are generally less interested in whether a firm has a presence in the metaverse and more interested in whether their lawyers truly understand the issues and have the experience. "Think of it as a mechanism for demonstrating familiarity, rather than a 'must-have,'" he said. Arent Fox crypto chair James Williams had a similar take with regard to his firm's recent foray. "You're trying to get in early," Williams told Love. "The idea, at a minimum, is to show clients that you're smart and familiar with the metaverse. We want to show our clients: We know this world; look, we bought in this world, and we can help them navigate this world."
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Music platform Spotify has acquired Podsights and Chartable. Financial terms were not disclosed. Hand Baldachin & Associates represented Podsights and Goodwin represented Chartable. Spotify was represented by a Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom team including partners Christopher Barlow, Howard Ellin, Stuart Levi, Steven Matays, Joseph Penko, David Schwartz, Kenneth Schwartz and Ingrid Vandenborre. Counsel information was not available for Spotify. Read the press release on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
ACCOUNTANT ACCOUNTABILITY - Deloitte was hit with a securities class action Thursday in Georgia Northern District Court. The court action was brought by Gordon Ball PLLC; Bienert Katzman Littrell Williams and Warren & Griffin against the defendants as auditors for Southern, an energy company. The suit contends that Deloitte allegedly misled investors regarding Southern's expected completion of its $2.88 billion Kemper Plant. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:22-cv-00670, Formby v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
West Coast Law Firms Match Milbank Scale, With Some Going Over the Top for Senior Associates By Jessie Yount Skilled in the Art With Scott Graham: Where's the Beef? IP Disputes Over Plant-Based Foods Are on a Mini-Roll By Scott Graham SIU Law Launching Prelaw Summer Institute for Diverse College Students By Christine Charnosky 10th Circ. Upholds Dismissal of Consumer Class Action Against Champion Petfoods By Allison Dunn State Supreme Court Rules Animal Cruelty Can Constitute Domestic Violence By Marianna Wharry|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
CURRENT CURRENCY - When your client base includes around 100 cryptocurrency developers, platforms and exchanges, it's probably a little awkward to have to keep saying, "Sorry, no bitcoin!" every time you send out a bill. As Law.com International's Jack Womack reports, U.K. hybrid law firm Gunnercooke has started accepting payment for its services in the form of cryptoassets. The firm's clients can now pay for legal and professional services using cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin or ether, it said in a statement. To that end, the firm is partnering with cryptoasset firm Coinpass. Naseer Patel, finance director at Gunnercooke, said that only a few U.S. law firms currently allow cryptoasset payments, and he was proud to be at the forefront of innovation in the U.K. He added: "We will now be able to work with a wider variety of clients across different jurisdictions, plus offer our partners the flexibility to be paid securely in the way they choose."
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"Every billable hour, every networking event, every late night will all be worth it. Do not give up."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for US's Hardline Approach to Region
BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readDemocratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Jury Awards $1.25M to Police Officer Who Claimed Sexual Harassment
- 2Lawyer as Whistleblower? Associate Sues Firm
- 3New Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
- 4Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
- 5'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250