14. Making Associates More Efficient Boosts Profit and Aids Retention
Law firms who commit to lean operations can offer training and mentoring in these skills to associates. This enables associates to make efficient use of their time and keeps them engaged, involved and innovative.
February 25, 2022 at 12:01 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
Moving from previous lessons on "people" to this series on "profit," we found that the key link-piece was efficiency. We discussed how efficiency is a friend to profit, not an enemy as some may assume. Now we'll dig into why it's so important to make associates more efficient.
Efficiency is one of the major tenets of lean practice, so it's nothing new to those practicing lean law. But it takes on even more importance during a talent war. Associates want to feel involved and relevant. Tasking them with mundane, non-essential, and frankly time-wasting jobs is a recipe for attrition, and during a talent war, there are plenty of opportunities elsewhere. On the other hand, firms who commit to lean operations can offer training and mentoring in these skills to associates. This enables associates to make efficient use of their time and keeps them engaged, involved and innovative.
With eye-watering salaries becoming the norm, it takes more than cash to retain top young talent. Sure, you can offer yoga sessions, concierge services at the office, flexible hours and all the free coffee and Danish you want (and associates want all that, and can get it), but in the end, those who are serious about being a lawyer will want job fulfillment. Lawyers who get mentored to practice efficiently and effectively will develop incrementally, and they will bring a productivity mindset to every project, every day.
That efficiency will inevitably turn into increased profit. Frankly, law firms pay associates too much to have them saddled with mundane, inefficient tasks. The clients who are faced with rate hikes feel the same way. Clients are aware that law firms are paying inflated salaries and passing these costs along in rate rises, and all of this is a big turn off. The best response is if you can tell clients that you provide efficiency training for associates, and if the client can see for themselves a team working efficiently on their case. Yes, the rates are high, but efficient associates record less hours. Overall, this saves the client money and helps the firm get better rates and still get retained for the next job. Efficiency benefits the associate, the firm, and the client.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGroen Strokoff O'Neill, LLC adds accomplished Trial Lawyer, William "Bill" Coppol.
1 minute readCushman Benchmark Survey (the “Sweepstakes”) Official Terms and Conditions
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250