14. Making Associates More Efficient Boosts Profit and Aids Retention
Law firms who commit to lean operations can offer training and mentoring in these skills to associates. This enables associates to make efficient use of their time and keeps them engaged, involved and innovative.
February 25, 2022 at 12:01 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
Moving from previous lessons on "people" to this series on "profit," we found that the key link-piece was efficiency. We discussed how efficiency is a friend to profit, not an enemy as some may assume. Now we'll dig into why it's so important to make associates more efficient.
Efficiency is one of the major tenets of lean practice, so it's nothing new to those practicing lean law. But it takes on even more importance during a talent war. Associates want to feel involved and relevant. Tasking them with mundane, non-essential, and frankly time-wasting jobs is a recipe for attrition, and during a talent war, there are plenty of opportunities elsewhere. On the other hand, firms who commit to lean operations can offer training and mentoring in these skills to associates. This enables associates to make efficient use of their time and keeps them engaged, involved and innovative.
With eye-watering salaries becoming the norm, it takes more than cash to retain top young talent. Sure, you can offer yoga sessions, concierge services at the office, flexible hours and all the free coffee and Danish you want (and associates want all that, and can get it), but in the end, those who are serious about being a lawyer will want job fulfillment. Lawyers who get mentored to practice efficiently and effectively will develop incrementally, and they will bring a productivity mindset to every project, every day.
That efficiency will inevitably turn into increased profit. Frankly, law firms pay associates too much to have them saddled with mundane, inefficient tasks. The clients who are faced with rate hikes feel the same way. Clients are aware that law firms are paying inflated salaries and passing these costs along in rate rises, and all of this is a big turn off. The best response is if you can tell clients that you provide efficiency training for associates, and if the client can see for themselves a team working efficiently on their case. Yes, the rates are high, but efficient associates record less hours. Overall, this saves the client money and helps the firm get better rates and still get retained for the next job. Efficiency benefits the associate, the firm, and the client.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLongtime AOC Director Glenn Grant to Step Down, Assignment Judge to Take Over
4 minute readHours After Trump Takes Office, Democratic AGs Target Birthright Citizenship Order
4 minute readHicks Johnson Promotes Lori Arakaki and Daniel Scime to Firm Partnership
2 minute readIAG Forensics & Valuation is excited to announce promotions at our firm effective 1/1/2025.
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Week in Data Jan. 24: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 2The Use of Psychologists as Coaches/Trial Consultants
- 3Could This Be the Era of Client-Centricity?
- 4New York Mayor Adams Attacks Fed Prosecutor's Independence, Appeals to Trump
- 5Law Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250