MorningMinute_767x633

Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.


|

WHAT WE'RE WATCHING

WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT - I'm not sure who would say such a thing, but apparently there's a notion out there that GCs are quick to complain about Big Law associate pay raises while continuing to accept the rate increases that get passed down to clients to cover those pay bumps. But, as Law.com's Phillip Bantz reports, in-house counsel say that portrayal of the situation isn't entirely accurate. Sure, some GCs are hesitant to split with their go-to law firms, whether it's because they have deeply rooted relationships with certain outside counsel, the firm is a powerhouse in a niche area of the law or they're in the midst of litigation or an important deal and it would be too onerous to switch firms midstream. But it would be a mistake to confuse hesitancy with complacency. Many GCs appear to be waiting to see whether law firms will, in fact, pass salary raises down to their clients by way of significant rate increases. And at least some say they're ready to take real action if necessary.  "It's not a foregone conclusion—and it's not something we'd accept," Amgen Inc.'s Los Angeles-based legal chief Jonathan Graham said of potential salary war-driven rate spikes.

CRYPTO CRIMEFIGHTERS - Not to be a buzzkill or anything, but if you were planning a cryptocurrency heist this weekend, maybe call it off. Last month, the DOJ revealed the scope of its ability to trace and recover digital assets used in cyber crime when it announced the landmark seizure of $3.6 billion in stolen Bitcoin and charged two people with conspiracy to commit money laundering. The arrests came months after the DOJ announced the creation of a cryptocurrency task force, and highlighted the agency's strengthened sophistication to delve into the nascent industry and the darkweb, which are often associated with anonymity.  And, as Law.com's Nate Robson writes in this week's Law.com Barometer newsletter, the news also highlights that DOJ's investigative techniques have judicial support. "This latest success indicates DOJ's crypto enforcement team is ready for primetime," Robson writes, noting that U.S. Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui praised the DOJ's search techniques, which relied on various algorithms and clustering software to identify patterns within the blockchain. "It is human nature to assess technological confidential sources with greater skepticism. Yet humans are 'Flawed. Weak. Organic,' whereas clustering software strives for perfection," Faruqui wrote, quoting a line from the movie "Star Trek First Contact." To receive the Law.com Barometer directly to your inbox each week, click here.

WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Theresa House of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer has entered an appearance for BetMGM LLC, an online casino, in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Nov. 22 in New Jersey District Court by Kluger Healey and Garteiser Honea PLLC on behalf of Beteiro LLC, asserts four patents related to gaming activity and sporting events. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Christine P. O'Hearn, is 1:21-cv-20156, Beteiro, LLC v. Betmgm, LLC et al. Read the complaint on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.

FAKE NEWS? - CNN was hit with a $100 million defamation lawsuit Thursday in Florida Middle District Court. The complaint was filed by Kobal Law and attorney Steven S. Biss on behalf of Lori Flynn, the wife of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. The suit centers on news coverage that the plaintiff alleges falsely portrayed her as a follower of extremist group QAnon. A similar lawsuit was filed against CNN on Mar. 1 by Michael Flynn's sister-in-law, Valerie Flynn. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 8:22-cv-00512, Flynn v. Cable News Network, Inc. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.  


|

EDITOR'S PICKS

As SCOTUS Clerk, Ketanji Brown Jackson Known for Her 'Even Keel' in Hot-Button Term By Marcia Coyle

Sneak Peek at the 2022 Go-To Law Schools: Nos. 31-40 By Christine Charnosky

Attorney Suspended for Being Intoxicated During Virtual Court Proceeding By Marianna Wharry

ABA Grants Full Approval to University of North Texas at Dallas College of Law By Christine Charnosky

New Lawsuits Latch Onto Infant Formula Recall By Amanda Bronstad


|

WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING

RUSSIAN TO DELETE -  Two law firms deleted sections of their websites dedicated to their extensive Russia work around the time of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Law.com International's Jack Womack reports. A probe into the cached pages of their websites show that U.K.-led firms Fieldfisher and Ashurst have both deleted details of work related to Russian state-owned clients from their websites. A screengrab of Ashurst's Russia and CIS page on its website from Feb. 25, a day after Russia's invasion, shows that the firm at the time included a list of Russian state clients and recent deals in the region. However, this section of the website was taken down soon after the invasion. Meanwhile, a cached snapshot of Fieldfisher's website for their corporate practice in Russia and CIS from Jan. 23 shows that, like Ashurst, the firm listed its recent work and clients in the country. Though the firm's wider Russia section is still up, its list of recent deals has been removed, meaning the website has been changed since Jan. 23.


|

WHAT YOU SAID

"Essentially we're in another Cold War, but it's in cyberspace."