Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
UNDER PRESSURE – The ripple effects of the latest associate pay raises by Cravath, Swaine & Moore, following bids by Milbank and Davis Polk & Wardwell earlier this year, are being felt throughout the industry, as Am Law 100 firms reassess their compensation structure to ward off poaching, reports Justin Henry and Patrick Smith. Compensation structures could finally be due for stratification this year, observers say. "Previously, during these raises, it was about matching at the more junior end to attract law school students," said Stephanie Biderman, a partner with legal recruiting firm Major, Lindsey & Africa. "But this time we saw the raises go to midlevel and senior associates." She said this trend could continue playing out, with firms being more targeted with their raises, rather than matching the elites across the board.
FREE SPEECH – After Norton Rose Fulbright put out an instruction that lawyers should not speak publicly about the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Walied Soliman, chair of Norton Rose Fulbright Canada, posted a message on social media contrary to the firm's instructions. The disagreement has shined a light on the potential consequences of governing speech within a law firm in the internet age, as a war takes place in the global spotlight, reports Jessie Yount. Consultants acknowledged that most businesses have a communications strategy for high-profile matters, including appointing a sole spokesperson to present the firm's policy. But, they said, Norton Rose Fulbright's message could have been crafted with more consideration for the emotional nature of the global conflict. "The lesson is that firms need to get ahead of situations like this and not just think about the business interests, which are clearly important, but how their decisions will play with their various audiences which include clients, attorneys, staff and the public," said Todd Templin, executive vice president of Boardroom PR.
FIGHTING RUSSIA – A Covington & Burling team has been in The Hague, fighting Russia to force payment of compensation for assets seized during the Crimean occupation. The first day of proceedings coincided with Vladimir Putin's current invasion of Ukraine. Some team members involved in the matter had to rush to Ukraine mid-hearing to tend to their families' safety. Arguments are now over, and The Hague is currently deliberating, reports Bruce Love. The case—while, on paper, a quarrel over a bilateral investment agreement between two states—has deep meaning for the economic security of Ukraine. And the matter has taken on even greater significance since Russia's wholesale invasion of Ukraine.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
'We Clearly Were Hacked': Thieves Steal $200,000 From Law Firm's Trust Account
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter Miami Arrest, Top Real Estate Broker Brothers Facing Sex Crimes Charges
Attorneys, Professors Share Support for Chancellor Following Musk's Online Attacks
4 minute readVisa CLO-Turned-Vice Chair Seeing Payoff From Expanded Role
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250