The Marble Palace Blog: Tweeting Supreme Court History
Duke Law professor Marin Levy has found a way to make Supreme Court history approachable and interesting, with small bites and Twitter threads.
March 10, 2022 at 05:15 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Thank you for reading The Marble Palace Blog, which I hope will inform and surprise you about the Supreme Court of the United States. My name is Tony Mauro. I've covered the Supreme Court since 1979 and for ALM since 2000. I semiretired in 2019, but I am still fascinated by the high court. I'll welcome any tips or suggestions for topics to write about. You can reach me at [email protected].
Twitter is many things, but it is hard to imagine it would be a resource for information about U.S. Supreme Court history.
But Marin Levy, a Duke University School of Law professor who is an expert on the federal judiciary and courts, decided during the pandemic to do just that, showing dozens of pictures of the likes of Oliver Wendell Holmes and Louis Brandeis, with fun facts about them. (The Supreme Court Historical Society also tweets.)
Levy's latest gem is a March 3 Twitter thread about Justice William Brennan Jr. and how he finally agreed to hire a female law clerk after years of favoring male clerks only. Levy drew readers in with this introduction: "My heart is wide open for this story tonight … It's about how Justice William Brennan, the liberal lion, was convinced to hire his first woman law clerk and who that clerk was. (Hint: She's a judge now herself.)" That clerk was Marsha Berzon, now a senior judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Levy got much praise from her followers, including one comment from Hogan Lovells partner Neal Katyal: "Amazing story. Thank you."
I interviewed Levy about how her Twitter threads and how her project came about:
When and why did you start these Supreme Court history threads?
Between all of us, the court threads began as a lark. I study courts for a living, and had been posting various "judicial fun facts" here and there. But then one night, at the beginning of the pandemic, the mood just felt so bleak and before I knew it, I was sharing what I hoped would be a light-hearted story—about the time I tried to buy Justice [Antonin] Scalia a drink.
That was the starting point and from there I began writing weekly, or so, threads about the bench and the people who occupy it. There are so many wonderful stories out there—so many inspiring people—and it's a true joy to get to share them each week.
Who is your target audience? And how many people have "liked" or followed your threads?
I try not to have any particular audience in mind—or I become very self-conscious very quickly! But it does seem that the threads are picked up by the "appellate Twitter" set—and they are a wonderful (and extremely witty) crowd.
Sometimes a few hundred people will like a particular thread and then sometimes, shockingly, it will be a few thousand. At the end of the day, I think many of us are drawn to learning about the trailblazers and, just as importantly, those who helped them along the way.
Have you gotten feedback from other SCOTUS nerds, historians, lawyers, etc. Any comments from justices? If I'm not mistaken, Justice [Samuel] Alito is a Duke fan and visitor.
The most gratifying feedback comes from people who say they learned something new and felt inspired by a particular story. There have been lovely comments by lawyers, other law professors, and even by a few members of the Article III club … but no justices yet!
Have you considered another format, such as turning the threads into a book?
A friend suggested the threads could be a book and I love the idea. My one hesitation is that each thread is meant to be bite-sized—something of an amuse-bouche. I'm not certain how that would translate into book form. Perhaps it works as a tasting menu? It would certainly be fun to attempt it.
Have you reached the point where you would feature current justices, or will you stay with the pre-Roberts era?
I might move closer to the present. One thing that is attractive about the past is that we tend to not be as acquainted with those figures—there is quite a bit to unearth and share. Those stories are also complete. When it comes to the present justices, it feels like they are still writing their stories.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Seeks Pause of Supreme Court Cases, Disavows DOJ Stance on Voting Rights Act
Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
4 minute readSupreme Court Takes Up Case Over Approval of Religious Charter School
Supreme Court Reinstates Corporate Disclosure Law Pending Challenge
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Digital Assets and the ‘Physical Loss’ Dilemma: How the Fourth Circuit’s Ruling on Crypto Theft Stands at Odds With Modern Realities
- 2State's Expert Discovery Rules Need Revision
- 3O'Melveny, White & Case, Skadden Beef Up in Texas With Energy, Real Estate Lateral Partner Hires
- 4Smaller Firms in 'Growth Mode' as Competition, Rates Heat Up
- 5Controlling Costs on Capital Construction Projects
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250