Law Firms Still Perplexed About How to Go Hybrid: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
March 15, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
2022 GO-TO LAW SCHOOLS - Oh yes… it's that time again. We've ranked the 50 law schools that sent the highest percentage of their 2021 juris doctor graduates to associate positions at the largest 100 law firms in the country. Columbia Law School tops the list for the ninth straight year, with 64% of its recent graduate class now working in Big Law. The University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School comes in at No. 2, followed by Cornell Law School at No. 3. But the top 50 list is only the tip of the iceberg. Go here to explore the entire 2022 Go-To Law Schools report, which includes interactive graphics that provide deeper insights into those 50 schools and dozens more, as well as the Big Law firms they feed.
HYBRID THEORIES - To be or not to be in the office? That is the question—and will likely continue to be the question for at least the next several months and possibly even years. "The most common conversation we have with law firms at the moment is around how to successfully implement a hybrid model," Gretta Rusanow, managing director and head of client advisory services at Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group, told Law.com's Andrew Maloney. She said in those conversations, the emphasis is on how best to train young lawyers and foster culture while people are physically separate. A particular focal point is the ease with which young lawyers now move from firm to firm, especially with salaries continuing to climb and formative firm experiences frequently happening over Zoom instead of in person. "So long as we remain in a war for talent, what your hybrid model looks like will be to some degree influenced heavily by what your biggest competitors are offering," Rusanow said. To be sure, there continues to be significant disconnect among various parties as to what a hybrid model should look like. As we noted last week in this column, 45% of respondents to a recent readers' poll conducted by Law.com's Contributing Editors group said they'd prefer a hybrid setup in which there is no mandated number of days per week for office work. But nearly 36% said their firms do currently require a set number of days in the office. Meanwhile, more than 26% said they expect their firms to do away with hybrid/remote work altogether by this time next year.
UGLY DISPUTE - Wilson Elser filed a trademark infringement lawsuit Monday in South Carolina District Court on behalf of HomeVestors of America Inc. in relation to its 'We Buy Ugly Houses' marks. The complaint accuses Robert J. Woodruff of using the confusingly similar mark 'We Buy Ugly Trailers' without the plaintiff's authorization. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 2:22-cv-00829, Homevestors of America Inc v. Woodruff. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Is the Great Resignation Really Just the Great Reshuffling? By Jacob Polacheck 'Overmentored and Underfunded': Diverse Entrepreneurs Dish on Legal Tech Startup Experience By Isha Marathe$500K Grant to Help UC Irvine Law Continue Research on Diversity and Networking in Law School
By Christine Charnosky
Attorney Gets Retroactive 5-Year Suspension for 'Severe and Widespread' Client Neglect By Marianna WharryWar in Ukraine: Tracking the Conflict's Reverberations Across The Legal Industry
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'This Trend Isn't Over': Law Firm Partner De-Equitizations Expected to Continue
To Ease Partner Pay Tensions, Some Law Firms Are Seeking 'Middle Ground' in Transparency
5 minute readRed Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
5 minute readBaker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250