17. If You Don't Expect Risk, Then Don't Expect Repeat Business
If risk is unexpected and unmanaged, it can imperil not only the project, but also the client relationship and so affect long term sustainable profitability. Factor risk into your work and advice and earn the trust of your clients.
March 18, 2022 at 12:02 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
A key insight from Lean Adviser is the "Just In Case" pause. This is where lean lawyers take a planned break from the efficient, effective and highly structured work delivery, to stop and ask themselves what have we missed? In this lesson, we take that idea and apply it to our discussion about redefining law firm profit. We started with how making associates more efficient boosts profit and aids retention (Lesson 2-14). Then we put this into a catchy formula which said Profit = Client Focus + Efficiency + Effectiveness, or P=CE2 for those who like symbolic shorthand (Lesson 2-15). Then, in the previous lesson, we added our guide to sustainability, where we turned some thinking on its head (Lesson 2-16).
But we can't close this series on redefining profit without asking the best question of all: What have we missed? One of the great acronyms which we can borrow from the world of manufacturing is "TGW" — Things Go Wrong. Manufacturers expect TGWs and look out for them. If you think that things can go wrong in scientifically engineered machines, imagine the capacity for this in our world, where causing TGWs for each other is considered part of the daily fun. So, no redefinition of law firm profitability can be complete until we introduce the last component — risk.
In-house and outside firms have an entirely different perspective on risk. To corporate counsel, it's what they're paid for. It's also the aspect of the job that their non-lawyer colleagues understand the most. C-Suite inhabitants will ask about the risks involved in any project. Outside counsel are less comfortable with risk. They are risk averse, by design and by training, and they're all too aware that they can trip each other up, trip themselves up, or just get hit by random capricious events.
If risk is unexpected and unmanaged, it can imperil not only the project, but also the client relationship and so affect long term sustainable profitability. If you don't expect risk, then don't expect repeat business. In contrast, if you do anticipate risk, factor it into your work and advice, then it's a big part of earning the trust of the clients, which leads to repeat business, which, in turn, leads to sustainable profit for the law firm.
So here's our tip list for law firms to live with risk and factor it in.
- Remember, the first risk was taken by the GC in hiring you, and it's the only one that can hurt them.
- Start with alignment on client expectations, always.
- Agree a plan and a road map with the client — if in doubt follow the planning stage in the first Lean Adviser module.
- Things will go wrong, so expect setbacks and be ready for them.
- Plan ahead and try to anticipate where the big risks might be, and the less obvious ones.
- Give business advice with an element of risk recognition and assessment.
- Think of risk management as a test of your skill set.
- Keep asking what could go wrong, and what might already have gone wrong?
- Build active monitoring and risk mitigation into your work and your mindset.
- When something goes wrong, detect it, be transparent, tell the client without spin, and then agree to a mitigation plan.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Narrow Path Back From Disbarment: 'You Have to Really Want to Be a Lawyer Again'
5 minute readNew Jersey Law Journal Names Mike Zogby Office Managing Partner of the Year
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 2GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 3Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
- 4Warner Bros. Accused of Misleading Investors on NBA Talks
- 5FTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250