In-House Departments Struggling With Hybrid: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
March 30, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
FROM AT HOME TO IN-HOUSE - Law firms aren't the only ones bewildered by hybrid work. As Law.com's Hugo Guzman reports, in-house departments are struggling with how to implement a system that adequately balances many workers' desire for maximum flexibility with the need for lawyers to build strong relationships with leaders of business units across the company. That last bit is increasingly important as the responsibilities of in-house counsel continue to expand. Many consultants and other experts say the pandemic has frayed relationships between legal departments and their corporate clients, in part because too many hybrid work environments are poorly structured. "For in-house counsel to be effective, they need to be aligned and connected with their corporate clients," said Jason Winmill, managing partner at the legal department consulting firm Argopoint. "Everyone being in the office is an important avenue to foster that collaboration. And that's going to be … not impossible but definitely more challenging in a hybrid environment."
TECH TALENT TEST - It's not just partners and associates—legal tech and innovation professionals are also participating in the Great Resignation. As the legal market embraces more innovation and technology in a pandemic economy, the demand for such talent is outpacing supply. But it's also a consequence of areas like legal operations becoming more mature, with those professionals now looking to effect change in other corners of the legal market. While such turnover is impacting law firms, legal departments, ALSPs and legal tech companies alike, not all areas of the market are equally equipped to handle it. As Law.com's Rhys Dipshan reports, the traditional culture and business model at some law firms are likely handicapping their ability to attract and retain legal tech and innovation talent. "Those who are in this space who want to innovate, who want to make things better, tend to seek out the organizations that focus on that," said Mollie Nichols, Hogan Lovells' former head of advanced client data solutions who recently left the firm to become the first CEO of Redgrave Data, the new subsidiary of e-discovery boutique Redgrave LLP. "It's not the core business of what a law firm does. So [they're] seeking out the ALSPs or the Big Four, [where] they feel more valued."
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Daniel M. Silver, Angela Whitesell, and Alexandra M. Joyce from McCarter & English have stepped in to defend AstraZeneca in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The complaint, filed March 17 in Delaware District Court by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld and Farnan LLP on behalf of Bristol-Myers Squibb, claims that AstraZeneca's Imfinzi drug infringes eight patents related to activating patients' immune systems to fight cancer cells. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika, is 1:22-cv-00346, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al. >>Read the complaint on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
DANCE FIGHT - Epic Games was hit with a copyright infringement lawsuit Tuesday in California Central District Court over the popular game Fortnite Battle Royale. The case was filed by Hecht Partners LLP on behalf of Kyle Hanagami, who contends that Epic misappropriated his choreography for non-party Charlie Puth's song "How Long" via a feature which gamers can purchase that enables their virtual characters to perform dances. The suit describes the Fortnite dance as an "inch-perfect copy" of Hanagami's copyrighted choreography, which has been viewed by millions on YouTube since it was first posted in 2017. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 2:22-cv-02063, Hanagami v. Epic Games, Inc. et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Significant Shakeup Among 2023 US News Law School Rankings as Harvard Drops Out of Top 3 By Christine Charnosky |
'It's Hard to Have a Discussion About This': The Uncomfortable Truth About Setting Tort Damages By Charles Toutant |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute readLife, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
8 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 2Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 3Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
- 4Georgia Supreme Court Honoring Troutman Pepper Partner, Former Chief Justice
- 5Insurer Not Required to Cover $29M Wrongful Death Judgment, Appeals Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250