Big Law Eyes Big Obstacles: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
March 31, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
BIG LAW'S BIGGEST OBSTACLES - The legal industry fared extremely well financially last year, and most firm leaders will tell you they're at least cautiously optimistic about the rest of this year. Still, to be a truly effective firm leader, you also have to specialize in cautious pessimism. With that in mind, many are already preparing for potential challenges created by a host of factors, from the talent war to actual war, as well as the ever-present threat of new COVID-19 variants and infection spikes. But there are also some obstacles on the horizon that firms can (somewhat) control. So what do they have their eyes on? Law.com's Andrew Maloney lays out a few key pain points that have firm leaders' attention so far in 2022.
FROM RISK-AVERSE TO METAVERSE - As companies stake out territory in the virtual world (or, more accurately, worlds) that make up the metaverse and seek to establish their brands in a still-fledgling but hugely promising marketplace, their outside counsel are beginning to join them in order to help identify and navigate business risks and opportunities. The law firms making this leap don't know exactly what they'll find in the metaverse—and, as we explore in the latest Law.com Trendspotter column, that's actually kind of the point. These early adopters are hoping to have a hand in shaping the metaverse as it inevitably expands. They're also hoping to hold onto their clients. As we noted in a recent Law.com Litigation Trendspotter column, while no one knows exactly where the all this is going, it's definitely not going away. Several major banks have estimated the value of the metaverse market in the trillions of dollars and Big Tech has gone all-in. When clients come to law firms seeking advice on how to get a piece of the action, "¯\_(ツ)_/¯" is not likely to be an acceptable answer. Just as having a presence on the internet quickly went from a novelty to a necessity for firms and other businesses, having a presence in the metaverse seems to be on a similar trajectory. I'm interested to hear from you: What do you view as the potential opportunities and risks for law firms and their clients entering the metaverse at this early stage? Let me know at [email protected].
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Bed Bath & Beyond announced on March 25 that is has entered a cooperation agreement with investor and GameStop executive chairman Ryan Cohen and RC Ventures LLC. Terms of the agreement will allow for three of RC Ventures' director designees to immediately join Bed Bath's board of directors as independent directors. Union, New Jersey-based Bed Bath was advised by a Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton team led by partners Paul Shim, Francesca Odell and Kim Spoerri. >> Read more on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
TRAMPLING ON THE 'CONSTITUTION'? - Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld sued the U.S. Small Business Administration and its administrator, Isabella Casillas Guzman, on Wednesday in District of Columbia District Court on behalf of Stairwell Productions, the producer of the national tour of Broadway play "What the Constitution Means to Me." The suit is part of a string of cases pursuing APA claims in connection with the agency's denial of emergency federal financial assistance amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 1:22-cv-00863, Stairwell Productions, LLC v. Small Business Administration et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
US Judge Slashes Gibson Dunn's Fee Request in Seinfeld Copyright Lawsuit By Tom McParland |
Critical Mass with Law.com's Amanda Bronstad: 3M Lost Two Earplug Verdicts, And One Was $50M. Four Opioid Trials to Watch in the Next Two Months. By Amanda Bronstad |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRed Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
5 minute readBaker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
2 minute readStars and Gripes: Merging Firms Need a ‘Superstar Culture’ for US Success
6 minute readLaw Firm Real Estate Strategy: Attorney Offices Are Out, Conference Rooms Are In
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Kirkland Hires Real Estate Finance Partners in New York
- 2Delaware Governor Names Magistrate Judge as Next Vice Chancellor
- 3Hagens Berman Accused of Withholding Share of $13M Award in Pharmaceutical Settlement
- 4What to Know About Naming a Law Firm
- 5Texas Shows the Way Forward in Resolving Mass Tort Gridlock
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250