Credit: Olga Yastremska/New Africa/Adobe Stock State Supreme Court Deems 'Intended to Harass' Phrase in Anti-Cyberbullying Law Unconstitutional
Boyd said that Moreno's statements were protected speech and could not be construed as true threats.
April 01, 2022 at 01:27 PM
5 minute read
Legislation
The Colorado Supreme Court this week sided with a man accused of harassing his ex-wife through posts on social media, upholding the district court's finding that the phrase "intended to harass" in a portion of state law unconstitutionally restricts protected speech.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Critics Ramp Up Ongoing Battle With SEC Over Settlement 'Gag Rule' in 9th Circuit
State Law Requiring Sex Offenders Display 'No Candy or Treats at This Residence' Sign Deemed Unconstitutional
4 minute read
After Vetoing AI Bill, Newsom Asks Ex-California Supreme Court Justice for Regulatory Ideas
4 minute read
State High Court Decides Appellate Split: Can the Smell of Burnt Cannabis Alone Justify Vehicle Search?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
