With Office Returns Lagging, Law Firms Are Downsizing Space: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
April 01, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Law Firm ManagementWant to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
GETTING REAL - Painful as it is to admit, the days of sprawling corporate office suites packed wall-to-wall with smiling faces and the giddy buzz of endless collaboration, innovation and professional development may really be behind us. As Law.com's Dan Packel reports, real estate experts say a growing number of large law firms are signing new leases that include substantial reductions in square footage, as the pace of office returns lags after two years away. With the war for talent in the legal industry more intense than ever, firms are looking to right-size their footprints to account for continued hybrid work and deliver appealing space for when personnel are working in the office. One analyst told Packel that most law firms are looking to reduce their footprints by 10 to 15% over the next five years. All this decision-making is unfolding in an environment where office attendance remains underwhelming and firm leaders are beginning to come to grips with the fact that a lobby the size of a Bass Pro Shop doesn't mean much if you don't have colleagues to share it with. "Firms are ready to make decisions for the most part, while, particularly during the start of COVID, there was a lot of reluctance to do so," said Kevin Kushner, who sits on the executive committee of CBRE's law firm practice group.
TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES - Not to get all originalist about it, but when the drafters of ABA Model Rule 1.1, comment 8, wrote that lawyers have an ethical obligation to "keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology," do you think they foresaw the possibility of a global pandemic turbocharging the evolution of legal tech? As Law.com's Rhys Dipshan writes in this week's Barometer newsletter, technological competency, while more necessary than ever, is also more difficult than ever. Today, the legal market is boldly moving into emerging technology areas at an unprecedented pace. That's real progress for an industry that is consistently derided for being behind the times, but keeping up with it all can be a nightmare. Still, there are potentially huge rewards waiting for those who are able to develop an expertise in emerging markets such as NFTs and the metaverse. And those markets also stand to benefit from the legal industry's participation, Dipshan notes, quoting Brown Rudnick IP partner Peter Willsey, who recently commented that the NFT market "will learn through litigation what can and can't be done."
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Coincheck Inc., a Japan-based cryptocurrency exchange platform and subsidiary of Monex Group, is going public via SPAC merger with Thunder Bridge Capital Partners IV Inc. As a result of the merger, Coincheck Group N.V. will be listed on the Nasdaq with a post-transaction equity value of approximately $1.25 billion. The transaction, announced March 22, is expected to close in the second half of 2022. Coincheck is represented by Anderson Mori & Tomotsune; De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek N.V. and a Simpson Thacher & Bartlett team including partners Alan Cannon and Patrick Naughton. Virginia-based Thunder Bridge is advised by Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough; Mori Hamada & Matsumoto; Littler Mendelson and Allen & Overy. >> Read more on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
HOUSE AND HOME - Dickinson Wright filed a lawsuit Thursday in Tennessee Middle District Court against the State of Tennessee and the Secretary of State Tre Hargett in relation to the state's residency requirement bill, which states that candidates running for U.S. Congress must reside within the congressional district they seek to represent for at least three years in order to appear on the primary ballot. The lawsuit seeks to enjoin the defendants from implementing the law on the basis that it violates Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which, according to the complaint, "delineates the only qualifications necessary to serve as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, and vests with the House of Representatives the exclusive authority to judge the qualifications of its own members." The case is 3:22-cv-00225, Collins et al v. State of Tennessee et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Challenge to Post-Death 'Hedonic' Damages Should Be Reheard, Dissenting Judges Say By Avalon Zoppo |
In 'Unicorn' Deal, Paul Hastings Lures 43-Lawyer Restructuring Team From Stroock By Bruce Love |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Think About Why You Want the Role, Because It Is Not an Easy Job,' Says Aaron Rubin of Morrison Foerster
Morgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250