Law Firms' Big Financial Gains Can't Mask Other Challenges: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
April 07, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
CATCHING UP - As we wrote in our most recent Law.com Trendspotter column, law firms are still riding the wave of unprecedented legal demand, but a wipeout could be imminent. To their credit, however, some firm leaders seem to be cognizant of this and, as Law.com's Andrew Maloney reports, are trying to avoid becoming victims of their own success. "[Success] could easily mask underlying challenges and weaknesses, and I think an honest study of the profession continues to reveal there are those challenges," said Pat Whalen, chair of Spencer Fane. "My concern about bottom-line growth is it can mask those challenges, so we want to be super vigilant about those challenges only continuing to escalate, to make sure our strategy not only takes that into account but actually benefits from that disruption." Similarly, Chase Simmons, chair of Polsinelli, said the start of the pandemic is still fresh in leaders' minds and remains a clear example of how tenuous things can become overnight, even as revenue and profits are soaring. "Because we know ultimately there will be a slowdown or some kind of a change in the market," Simmons said. "We've been growing quickly. But we want to be cognizant that it won't be like this forever. That's for sure."
AUDITORY HALLUCINATIONS - The Big Four accounting firms seem perpetually mired in allegations of botched, biased or influenced audits. But if you think that's somehow going to lessen the threat they pose to law firms, you're dreaming. "Even though they're still nominally called audit firms, the audit divisions long ago became peripheral to what the Big Four offer," Tomek Jankowski, director of the Pacesetter Research team at ALM Intelligence, told Law.com's Bruce Love. Providing legal services, while not central to any of the Big Four's offerings, is nonetheless seen as an important value add to their businesses, said Jankowski. "Law firm managing partners are probably correct that the Big Four will never go head-to-head with them on litigation or legal advice," said Jankowski. "But they are still an existential threat to law firms." He explained that the Big Four use their legal service offerings as a way to become stickier with their clients. "They approach clients when the client has a key event, such as M&A restructuring, an IPO, change management, or digital transformation projects," said Jankowski. "Being able to provide the legal services for these events is central to a law firm, but it's a value add to an accounting or consulting firm."
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Attorneys at Jackson Lewis on Wednesday removed a breach-of-contract lawsuit against Deutsche Bank to Massachusetts District Court. The suit was filed by Rodman Employment Law on behalf of cybersecurity company Inebular, which was approached in 2019 by non-party Navitec on Deutsche Bank's behalf. Inebular accuses Deutsche Bank of rescinding an official job offer made to Inebular's president, George Domenikos. The complaint further contends that Navitec denies making the decision to rescind, while Deutsche Bank denies making an offer outright. The case is 1:22-cv-10477, iNebular, Inc. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas. >>Read the complaint on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
VOICE OF THE VOICELESS - Google was hit with an antitrust lawsuit Wednesday in District of Columbia District Court centered on the market for voice assistant a/k/a "wakeword" technology. The lawsuit was filed by Global IP Law Group on behalf of Sensory Inc., which accuses Google of preventing its voice-recognition technology from running on Android mobile phones in order to stifle competition. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 1:22-cv-00937, Sensory, Inc. v. Google LLC. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Chief Justice Roberts, for First Time, Joins Liberal Wing's Criticism of 'Shadow Docket' By Marcia Coyle |
ABA Implements New Policy Aimed at Improving Diversity on CLE Panels, Effective Immediately By Christine Charnosky |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute readRemembering Am Law 100 Firm Founder and 'Force of Nature' Stephen Cozen
5 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250