19. An Associate Lost In Space Will Be An Associate Lost Forever
If the focus is on what the firm wants from the associate, never what they want for the associate, this associate doesn't have the toolset, or the mindset to do the best work, or to turn away a call from a recruiter. This associate is lost in space.
April 08, 2022 at 12:15 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
Just as Lean Adviser starts with planning, our short series on talent retention and 'working wellness' started with planning. The previous lesson looked at how attorneys who feel good, physically and mentally, won't just perform well, they'll also stick. Meanwhile, for others, the daily prospect is daunting and demoralizing. We concluded that real working wellness isn't about the setting, it's about how we do the work itself, starting with planning. So, just as in Lean Adviser, after planning comes execution.
If you want to understand the direct link between working methods and associate retention, just consider how an attorney executes a task, any task. Let's imagine a millennial associate in law firm A, maybe earning the big bucks, but living an unplanned work life. The firm has no career path or development plan. In just the same unstructured way, partners give work to the associate in a vacuum. No context, no project plan, just deliver the task and record the time. The entire focus is on what the firm wants from the associate, never what they want for the associate. This associate doesn't have the toolset, or the mindset to do the best work, or to turn away a call from a recruiter. This associate is lost in space.
Now consider the situation of another millennial associate, working across the street at law firm B. Everything about this associate's work life is planned and structured. Law firm B invests in more than the salary, they invest in the individual. They know their associates need to feel valued, which means being mentored, developed and being part of a career plan. They want to make their attorneys feel confident and secure, knowing they're on plan, and that the resources will always be made available.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
3 minute readNetflix Music Guru Becomes First GC of Startup Helping Independent Artists Monetize Catalogs
2 minute read'Ridiculously Busy': Several Law Firms Position Themselves as Go-To Experts on Trump’s Executive Orders
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250