Deal Work Boom Leading to Legal Mal Boom: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
April 19, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
RARE COMBINATIONS - When it comes to available midsize law firm mergers, there aren't exactly plenty of fish in the sea. Though behind-the-scenes merger discussions are abundant, there are fewer and fewer opportunities that make strategic sense, consultants told Law.com's Jessie Yount. "Every time a deal happens, there is one less person looking for a deal. Each subsequent deal has more baggage," said Mike Short, co-founding principal of LawVision. "There is no perfect 30-lawyer corporate boutique with an amazing book of business left." While some midsize firms are highly protective of their culture and size, others that are extremely successful within a niche or a specific jurisdiction likely prefer to run on their own, according to Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie managing partner Kenneth Van Winkle. Simply put: "Those that were interested [in a deal] have already merged, and the good firms still out there probably aren't interested," Van Winkle said.
OPPORTUNITY COST - The avalanche of transactional work since late 2020 has done wonders for law firms' bottom lines, but it hasn't been without its drawbacks. As Law.com's Dan Packel reports, this increase in deals has also led to a striking number of high-value legal malpractice claims. When joined with a growing level of cybersecurity risk, it should be no surprise law firms' overall insurance expenses are on the rise. Several legal malpractice experts believe that the alignment of spiking demand with a tight talent market is creating an environment where attorneys in transactional practices are putting in more hours than ever—and consequently making more errors. And there's some sentiment that remote work has also introduced more into the process. "The large international firms are doing work at a crazy level, especially on the transactional side. Combine that with the effects of COVID, with eight to 10 attorneys on the same deal not being in same room. You've got overworked lawyers going from 2,400 hours now to 2,800 or 3,000," said Hinshaw & Culbertson partner Matthew Henderson. "Combine all these factors together and it's a perfect storm."
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - John Cannizzaro and Daniel M. Anderson of Ice Miller have stepped in as defense counsel to motorcycle parts provider Arlen Ness Enterprises Inc. in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The action, filed March 15 in California Northern District Court by Whitewood Law pursues claims on behalf of Amazon sellers whom seek a declaration of non-infringement in connection with using the "deep cut" mark. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathanael M. Cousins, is 5:22-cv-01656, Httmt Group LLC et al v. Arlen Ness Enterprises, Inc. >>Read the complaint on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
WASTE OF MONEY - Republic Services, a Phoenix-based waste disposal company, and other defendants were slapped with a class action Monday in South Carolina District Court. The suit accuses the defendants of overcharging its customers via unlawful rate increases and so-called "fuel recovery fees." The complaint was brought by Hodge & Langley Law and other law firms on behalf of Budget Inns of Pensacola, Buffalo Seafood House and similarly situated waste disposal customers. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 7:22-cv-01242, Buffalo Seafood House LLC et al v. Republic Services Inc et al. S tay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
'There Are Long-Term Consequences': Why Improving Mental Health in the Legal Profession Must Begin in Law School By Christine Charnosky |
'Significant Jump' in Client Inquiries Leads to New Diversity Practice at Nixon Peabody By Jessie Yount |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute read‘What’s Up With Morgan & Morgan?’ Law, Advertising and a Calculated Rise
10 minute readConservative Boutiques That Backed Trump Reap Their Rewards
What Will Happen to the Nominees in Florida's Southern and Middle Districts?
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1While Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can be Prevented
- 2The Definition of Special Employment
- 3People in the News—Nov. 21, 2024—Willig Williams, Hangley Aronchick
- 4Rawle & Henderson Hires New Del. Managing Partner
- 5Divided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250