Law Firms Aren't Just Competing With Each Other Anymore: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
April 25, 2022 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
HELP WANTED (OK, NEEDED) - Job postings for business professionals in law firms are at an all-time high, industry experts tell Law.com's Patrick Smith. Large and midsize law firms are experiencing significant staffing shortages now, partly a result of firms needing to hire more support when their attorney ranks expanded or went remote. But filling those roles isn't exactly going to be easy given that, as Smith explains, these firms aren't just competing with each other for talent. They're also up against the software company, the consulting firm and the life sciences conglomerate, all of whom are prepared to offer competitive pay, advancement opportunities and perhaps a culture where the business professional feels more valued. Firms also face a shifting tide in how and where people work. What does all this mean? Competitive compensation is but one part of an increasingly complicated calculation for firms that want to compete. "Looking across the street at the law firm next door isn't going to get it done," Jennifer Johnson, CEO and founder of law firm executive recruitment firm Calibrate Legal, said. "Take the best practices of other industries and use them. Firms think that once they have hired the best people, they are done. But business professionals, like attorneys, need constant motivation, engagement and encouragement."
MOVING UNITS - When it comes to lateral moves, there continues to be strength in numbers. Industry analysts say lateral group moves are picking up steam in 2022 amid remote work and a relative decline in law firm merger activity, according to Law.com's Andrew Maloney. And the Windy City will remain a point of emphasis due to its rate structure, private capital and emerging presence on the tech scene. Big firms have already made a splash this year with large lateral groups: Paul Hastings had a 43-attorney hire; Norton Rose Fulbright added an 11-lawyer litigation team; Parker Poe announced a 16-attorney group hire; and Fennemore Craig picked up 24 lawyers at once. DLA Piper became the latest last Thursday when it said it added a 27-lawyer private equity lawyer addition in Chicago from Michigan-based Honigman. In general, according to Susan Mendelsohn, a Chicago-based legal recruiter who helped on the DLA move, the growth of remote work has helped lawyers entertain lateral opportunities they may not have had before and a decline in completed law firm mergers has potentially contributed to more large-group laterals. "Maybe the firms that need to merge aren't merging, so larger, profitable groups are finding new homes within a larger platform that are more beneficial to their practice. Because if you're at a smaller firm, there is a ceiling to your growth, for sure," she said.
BIG TECH BEDFELLOWS? - Google, parent company Alphabet, Apple and both companies' chief executives were hit with an antitrust lawsuit Friday in California Northern District Court. The suit alleges that Apple and Google struck an anti-competitive pact whereby Apple agreed not to compete with Google in the search business and Google agreed to pay Apple billions of dollars to be the default search engine on Apple devices. The suit, brought on behalf of more than 25 individuals, is backed by the Alioto Law Firm, Bonsignore Trial Lawyers, the Veen Firm, and other plaintiffs firms. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 3:22-cv-02499, Arcell et al v. Google LLC et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com .
EDITOR'S PICKS
9th Circuit Rejects LinkedIn's Claims of Unlawful Data Scraping By Marianna Wharry |
Only Half of Test-Takers Passed the February Texas Bar Exam By Brenda Sapino Jeffreys |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDoes Your Corporate Compliance Program Reasonably Prevent Fraud? New UK Guidance Demands It
11 minute readKPMG Wants to Provide Legal Services in the US. Now All Eyes Are on Their Big Four Peers
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
- 2A Simple 'Trial Lawyer' Goes to the Supreme Court
- 3Clifford Chance Adds Skadden Rainmaker in London
- 4Latham, Kirkland and Paul Weiss Climb UK M&A Rankings
- 5Goodwin Hires Quinn Emanuel Partner to Launch Office in Brussels
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250