The Super Rich Law Firms List Gets More Crowded: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
April 28, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
WELCOME TO THE CLUB - The American Lawyer's Super Rich Law Firms list is still exclusive, but this year it's a little less "15-minute trip on Jeff Bezos' spaceship" exclusive and a little more "Costco Executive Membership" exclusive. Still good though! As Law.com's Ben Seal writes, a year after the thresholds to gain entry were elevated to account for the Am Law 100's pandemic success story in 2020, the group of Super Rich firms has expanded by 34%—from 31 firms to 40—in the wake of an even more profitable sequel. To make the Super Rich list, firms must have revenue per lawyer of at least $1.1 million and profits per lawyer of at least $550,000—markers that indicate an organization is getting the most out of everyone it employs. Demand over the past two years has been "insatiable," McDermott chair Ira Coleman told Seal, and that has been the biggest contributor to the newfound level of prosperity across the industry. But Coleman also cautioned that firm leaders would be wise to recognize that demand is a fickle factor in their success. No matter how much top-to-bottom talent or structural integrity a firm has at its disposal, an unexpected dip in demand would threaten budgets across the Am Law 100. As Coleman quite succinctly put it: "Don't get too high on your own supply." Explore the entire 2022 Am Law 100 report here.
OPERATING EXPENSES - Legal ops professionals are priceless—like, literally, there's apparently no set price for them. Compensation for heads of legal ops ranges from $100,000 to $400,000, according to Brightflag's recently released Corporate Legal Operations Survey, with pay highly correlated to legal department size. "Legal operations is still very much the Wild West of in-house legal department management. Even sophisticated legal departments have found it challenging to find the right mix of talent and experience for legal operations roles, and many struggle to determine what a fair price for that talent should be," Jason Winmill, managing partner at Boston-based legal department consulting firm Argopoint, told Law.com's Trudy Knockless. "At more junior levels, operational talent from other parts of the business continues to migrate into legal operations, creating new generations of legal operations professionals," he said. Winmill said companies that struggle to hire at the management level for legal operations should look to leadership-minded individuals who already support their legal departments in finance, information technology and human resources. "A quick look through the profiles of legal operations leaders at Fortune 100 companies suggests many, if not most, started their careers in legal operations in that exact way," he said.
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Martin R. Martos II and Gabrielle Winslow of Fox Rothschild have stepped in to defend iRobot Corporation in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed March 10 in Illinois Northern District Court by Frankfort Law Group, contends that iRobot knowingly sold defective Roomba vacuums to consumers and charged consumers $59 for a repair kit that did not remedy the defect. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Martha M. Pacold, is 1:22-cv-01290, Toolis v. iRobot Corporation. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
GONE ROGUE? - SPH Group Holdings and Warren G. Lichtenstein, executive chair of Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings and Steel Partners Holdings, filed a securities lawsuit Wednesday in California Central District Court. The complaint, brought by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Olshan Frome Wolosky and other lawyers, targets current Aerojet CEO Eileen P. Drake and other defendants for allegedly engaging in a "rogue campaign" to install Drake's "hand-picked" board after rejecting Lichtenstein's nominees. The complaint arises from the filing of a preliminary proxy statement last Friday seeking shareholder support to remove current board members in order to replace them with Drake's picks. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 2:22-cv-02788, Lichtenstein et al v. Drake et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Justice Breyer Gets an Emotional Thanks From Chief Justice After Final Oral Argument By Marcia Coyle |
Mizzou Law Dean Lyrissa Lidsky Stepping Down By Christine Charnosky |
By Andrew Goudsward |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Polsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
5 minute readLaw Firms Are 'Pinching Themselves' Amid Double-Digit Profit Growth and Billing Rate Hikes
5 minute readWhat Practices Are Driving Law Firms’ ‘Remarkable’ Performance in 2024?
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250