The Super Rich Law Firms List Gets More Crowded: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
April 28, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Law Firm ProfitabilityWHAT WE'RE WATCHING
WELCOME TO THE CLUB - The American Lawyer's Super Rich Law Firms list is still exclusive, but this year it's a little less "15-minute trip on Jeff Bezos' spaceship" exclusive and a little more "Costco Executive Membership" exclusive. Still good though! As Law.com's Ben Seal writes, a year after the thresholds to gain entry were elevated to account for the Am Law 100's pandemic success story in 2020, the group of Super Rich firms has expanded by 34%—from 31 firms to 40—in the wake of an even more profitable sequel. To make the Super Rich list, firms must have revenue per lawyer of at least $1.1 million and profits per lawyer of at least $550,000—markers that indicate an organization is getting the most out of everyone it employs. Demand over the past two years has been "insatiable," McDermott chair Ira Coleman told Seal, and that has been the biggest contributor to the newfound level of prosperity across the industry. But Coleman also cautioned that firm leaders would be wise to recognize that demand is a fickle factor in their success. No matter how much top-to-bottom talent or structural integrity a firm has at its disposal, an unexpected dip in demand would threaten budgets across the Am Law 100. As Coleman quite succinctly put it: "Don't get too high on your own supply." Explore the entire 2022 Am Law 100 report here.
OPERATING EXPENSES - Legal ops professionals are priceless—like, literally, there's apparently no set price for them. Compensation for heads of legal ops ranges from $100,000 to $400,000, according to Brightflag's recently released Corporate Legal Operations Survey, with pay highly correlated to legal department size. "Legal operations is still very much the Wild West of in-house legal department management. Even sophisticated legal departments have found it challenging to find the right mix of talent and experience for legal operations roles, and many struggle to determine what a fair price for that talent should be," Jason Winmill, managing partner at Boston-based legal department consulting firm Argopoint, told Law.com's Trudy Knockless. "At more junior levels, operational talent from other parts of the business continues to migrate into legal operations, creating new generations of legal operations professionals," he said. Winmill said companies that struggle to hire at the management level for legal operations should look to leadership-minded individuals who already support their legal departments in finance, information technology and human resources. "A quick look through the profiles of legal operations leaders at Fortune 100 companies suggests many, if not most, started their careers in legal operations in that exact way," he said.
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Martin R. Martos II and Gabrielle Winslow of Fox Rothschild have stepped in to defend iRobot Corporation in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed March 10 in Illinois Northern District Court by Frankfort Law Group, contends that iRobot knowingly sold defective Roomba vacuums to consumers and charged consumers $59 for a repair kit that did not remedy the defect. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Martha M. Pacold, is 1:22-cv-01290, Toolis v. iRobot Corporation. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Week in Data Sept. 25: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Senior Partners Approach $3,000 an Hour, As More Billing Rate Hikes Expected in 2025
5 minute read'More Deals and Larger Deals': Big Law Dealmakers Weigh In on Rate Cut Impact
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 2What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 3Ex-Prosecutor and Judge Fatally Shot During Attempted Arrest on Federal Corruption Charges
- 4Judge Blasts Authors' Lawyers in Key AI Suit, Says Case Doomed Without Upgraded Team
- 5Federal Judge Won't Stop Title IX Investigation Into Former GMU Law Professor
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholders Christina M. Carroll and A. Michael Pratt have entered appearances for the Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities, Wendy Spicher in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 13 in Texas Northern District Court by Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders; Ashcroft Sutton Reyes; and Locke Lord on behalf of TMX Finance Corporate Services, seeks to challenge the secretary’s ongoing attempt to regulate commercial lending activity outside the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The suit furthers contends that the secretary issued an investigative subpoena to TMX for potential violations of the Pennsylvania Loan Interest and Protection Law and the Consumer Discount Company Act despite TMX's business activities not being governed by such. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge David C. Godbey, is 3:24-cv-02054, TMX Finance Corporate Services Inc v. Spicher.
Who Got The Work
Joseph J. Mueller and Rachel Bier of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have entered appearances for Omachron Alpha, Omachron Intellectual Property and SharkNinja Operating in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 16 in Massachusetts District Court by Kirkland & Ellis, asserts three patents in connection with SharkNinja's sale of the 'Vertex' and 'Stratos' cordless vacuum cleaners. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs, is 1:24-cv-12373, Dyson, Inc. et al v. SharkNinja, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Shloime Fellig of Latham & Watkins has entered an appearance for Ardelyx the company's CEO and CFO in a pending securities class action related to Xphozah, a drug which treats kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. The complaint, filed Aug. 16 in Massachusetts District Court by Pomerantz LLP, contends that the defendants failed to disclose that the company would not be seeking the drug’s acceptance into the Transitional Drug Add-on Payment Adjustment, a bundled payment system regulated by the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin, is 1:24-cv-12119, Yarborough v. Ardelyx, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Alexander P. Ott, Megan Corrigan and Karen Gover of McDermott Will & Emery have entered appearances for Analog Devices, a Massachusetts-based manufacturer of semiconductor processing equipment, in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, which asserts two patents, was filed July 9 in Massachusetts District Court by Arrowood LLP and the Devlin Law Firm on behalf of Ocean Semiconductors. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Patti B. Saris, is 1:24-cv-11759, Ocean Semiconductors LLC v. Analog Devices Inc.
Who Got The Work
Forrest M. 'Teo' Seger of Clark Hill has entered an appearance for Equifax Information Services in a pending lawsuit for claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The case was filed Aug. 13 in Texas Western District Court by Halvorsen Klote on behalf of Quinton Humphrey. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Fred Biery, is 5:24-cv-00892, Humphrey v. LVNV Funding, LLC et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250