Do Law Schools Need Standardized Tests?: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
May 11, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
TRUE TEST - The Council of the American Bar Association's Section of Legal Education and Admissions is set to consider doing away with Standard 503, which requires law schools to use standardized testing as part of their admissions processes. But while the move would be welcomed by many who believe it could, in theory, make law school more accessible to diverse applicants, its practical effect could prove muted. Still, advocates see it as a potential step in the right direction. "I have yet to meet the person who believes the GRE or LSAT will go away with the elimination of Standard 503," Marc Miller, dean of the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law, told Law.com's Christine Charnosky. But, he added, "having an absolute testing mandate impedes flexibility and innovation." Not everyone agrees that tossing the standardized testing mandate would be a boon for diverse law school applicants, however. The Law School Admission Council reacted to the news with a statement that said "studies show test-optional policies often work against minoritized individuals, so we hope the ABA will consider these issues very carefully." Meanwhile, Alberto Acereda, associate vice president of Global Higher Education at ETS, said, "In the law admissions space, the GRE has done critical work in helping to diversify student cohorts and provide access for students to legal education, regardless of their background, global location or undergraduate institution."
THE GREAT RESENTMENT - As Law.com's Patrick Smith reports, more than 3,400 respondents from law firms around the globe detailed the state of their mental health, work environments, perceptions of colleagues, client expectations and the effects of remote work for Law.com and ALM Intelligence's annual Mental Health Survey. Overall this year, there were slight declines from 2021 in terms of those reporting anxiety (67%), depression (35%) and isolation (44%). There also was an increase in those who believe their firms provide a safe environment to raise concerns about mental health (45.4%). However, for the third year in a row, close to three-fourths of respondents (74.3%) believed their work environment contributed to their mental health issues. Former commercial litigator and current executive coach and wellness expert Jarrett Green said he found it interesting that, according to the survey results, individuals felt their own well-being was improving but felt the well-being in their firms was not. "This could suggest that people have built a sense of internal resiliency over the course of the pandemic that is making them feel a bit healthier, while also believing that their improved resiliency has resulted despite—not because of—their firm's culture. This combination can create a sense of resentment toward one's firm, which can help explain the Great Resignation," Green said
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Centene has agreed to sell Magellan Rx to Prime Therapeutics for approximately $1.4 billion in a deal guided by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom; McDermott Will & Emery; and Fox Rothschild. The transaction, announced May 5, is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2022. St. Louis-based Centene is represented by a Skadden Arps team including partners Jeremy London and Paul Schnell. Prime Therapeutics, which is based in Minnesota, is advised by McDermott Will and a Fox Rothschild team. >> Read more on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
FAULTY FORUM - JPMorgan Chase sued Morganroth Founder Holdings Inc. Tuesday in California Central District Court to block an arbitration filing from proceeding before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA. The lawsuit, brought by Greenberg Traurig, contends that the defendant, a customer of JPMorgan Chase Bank, is improperly attempting to arbitrate claims against the wrong entities and in the wrong forum. The case is 2:22-cv-03180, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al v. Morganroth Founder Holdings, Inc. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Maine Board of Examiners Announces Limited Seating, Preferential Treatment for July Bar Exam By Christine Charnosky |
9th Circuit: Wrongful Death Claim Cannot Arise Before Death, Even If Cause of Death Is Anticipated By Marianna Wharry |
University of Texas at Austin School of Law Appoints New Dean By Christine Charnosky |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllT14 Sees Black, Hispanic Law Student Representation Decline Following End of Affirmative Action
'It's Like They Lynched You:' Law Professor's Discrimination Claim Reaches High Court
7 minute readSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250