The Washington Supreme Court ruled that the state’s law requiring a certificate of merit for medical malpractice claims against state agents is facially unconstitutional.

The law governing claims for violations of accepted standard of care, RCW 7.70.150, was enacted in 2006 as part of a larger reform effort regarding medical malpractice cases. The statute requires that a plaintiff must file a certificate of merit from a health care provider stating that there is a reasonable probability that the defendant’s conduct did not follow the accepted standard of care required.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]