Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
LAST CHANCE FOR AI? – The quest to give artificial intelligence the status of "inventor" is still making its way through the courts—after more than a few setbacks. Stephen Thaler originally tried to get his AI system, deemed " DABUS" listed as an investor on a patent application, which the PTO rejected. After U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema of the Eastern District of Virginia sided with the patent agency, the case, Thaler v. Vidal, is now before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Scott Graham reports. The judges in that court, however, seem cool to arguments from Brown Neri Smith & Khan partner Ryan Abbott, who is representing Thaler. At one point in the hearing, Judge Richard Taranto even asked: "Do the mythic monkeys who type out Shakespeare get to be copyright holders?"
COVID ISN'T COVERED – Restaurants looking to their business interruption insurance as a pandemic lifeline may have hit the end of the road. Katheryn Hayes Tucker reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently became the latest court to deny restaurants' argument that their insurance should cover losses stemming from shutdowns caused by COVID-19. In the ruling, Judge Britt Grant noted the broad consensus among U.S. courts on this issue. "So far, every federal and state appellate court to consider the issue (including this one) has held that the presence of COVID-19 causes a business's property intangible harm, rather than direct physical harm. That means COVID-19-related expenses and losses are not covered." The judge added that as of now, no court has allowed restaurants' cases to go forward. "We are not alone in our conclusion," she said.
COURTS' CLOUD NECESSITY – As courts have adjusted to the need for more remote and digital proceedings, they're struggling with one byproduct of the transition: an exploding volume of digital evidence and court data. In response, some state courts are joining others in the legal industry by embracing cloud storage. But as Isha Marathe reports, they're not jumping in head first. Some are being cautious around what data they turn over to cloud storage providers, concerned over potential cybersecurity and privacy risks. Others also worry about their potential overreliance on one cloud vendor. But despite all their reservations, many predict that cloud storage of court data will only increase in the near future.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Plaintiffs Firms Eye Metaverse as Growth Target for Litigation
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250