WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
LAST CHANCE FOR AI? – The quest to give artificial intelligence the status of "inventor" is still making its way through the courts—after more than a few setbacks. Stephen Thaler originally tried to get his AI system, deemed " DABUS" listed as an investor on a patent application, which the PTO rejected. After U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema of the Eastern District of Virginia sided with the patent agency, the case, Thaler v. Vidal, is now before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Scott Graham reports. The judges in that court, however, seem cool to arguments from Brown Neri Smith & Khan partner Ryan Abbott, who is representing Thaler. At one point in the hearing, Judge Richard Taranto even asked: "Do the mythic monkeys who type out Shakespeare get to be copyright holders?"
COVID ISN'T COVERED – Restaurants looking to their business interruption insurance as a pandemic lifeline may have hit the end of the road. Katheryn Hayes Tucker reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently became the latest court to deny restaurants' argument that their insurance should cover losses stemming from shutdowns caused by COVID-19. In the ruling, Judge Britt Grant noted the broad consensus among U.S. courts on this issue. "So far, every federal and state appellate court to consider the issue (including this one) has held that the presence of COVID-19 causes a business's property intangible harm, rather than direct physical harm. That means COVID-19-related expenses and losses are not covered." The judge added that as of now, no court has allowed restaurants' cases to go forward. "We are not alone in our conclusion," she said.
COURTS' CLOUD NECESSITY – As courts have adjusted to the need for more remote and digital proceedings, they're struggling with one byproduct of the transition: an exploding volume of digital evidence and court data. In response, some state courts are joining others in the legal industry by embracing cloud storage. But as Isha Marathe reports, they're not jumping in head first. Some are being cautious around what data they turn over to cloud storage providers, concerned over potential cybersecurity and privacy risks. Others also worry about their potential overreliance on one cloud vendor. But despite all their reservations, many predict that cloud storage of court data will only increase in the near future.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5First Lawsuit Filed Alleging Contraceptive Depo-Provera Caused Brain Tumor
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250