28. Conclusions and Client Connector (Detox, Cleansing) Tool
Connecting with clients and bridging the disconnect in our profession is the single most important survival skill any law firm can develop. Every law firm wants to stand for something, and have a set of values, but be sure to make them clear, relevant and client-facing, because this is what will resonate.
June 10, 2022 at 12:39 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
This lesson wraps up our mini-series on law firm values, and the last few series of lessons has addressed several ways to improve the attorney-client experience and bridge the disconnect between GCs and outside counsel. So let's pause for breath and recap. Law firms are aware that clients want to know what they stand for. Clients want to go into business with law firms which have a clear set of values. Not just institutionally, in terms of diversity, pro bono and ESG, but also values that will inform their daily practice of law. It's this last piece which firms so often fail to grasp.
This is why we ran a mini-series on the attorney-client experience, first from the attorney side, then from the client perspective. We concluded that it should really be seen as a shared journey. That led us to our last mini-series, a case study of a fictitious law firm Diamond LLP. We saw how they recognized the importance of having law-firm values. We also saw how their proposition was 'we have smart lawyers and good experience, so we can offer you a superior service', but that's not what clients heard.
These two mini-series — 'the shared journey' and 'law firm values' — both highlighted the big disconnect in the legal profession. If you see a legal assignment as a transactional service for money rather than a shared experience, then you are disconnected. Likewise, if you think business development is an activity, rather than an outcome of attorney methods, behaviors and mindsets, you're disconnected. This is where Lean Adviser can be a key asset, because it's a complete curriculum of all the methods to connect law firms to clients.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute readFederal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250