On-Demand
Cost: Complimentary
Sponsored by:
We've all heard the myths about working for a flexible legal talent provider: I can't build my career, there are no benefits, and it's just a quick fix between jobs. However, the reality is quite the opposite. Working with a flexible legal talent provider allows you to choose engaging work to focus on, access benefits, develop professionally, and build a powerful network. What are the other perks of working for an adaptable legal talent provider?
Join this webcast where we debunk myths and misconceptions associated with working for a flexible legal talent provider. You will learn how to:
- Embrace flexibility, inclusion, and purpose to help drive your work.
- Balance your life and legal practice.
- Gain access to innovative clients.
- Enhance your skill sets and build your personal brand.
Speakers
Sarah Carlin | Co-Host Sarah is a Senior Manager on Axiom's Talent Acquisition team. Sarah joined Axiom in 2021 after spending over five years concentrating on recruiting senior level legal talent for interim engagements for AM100 law firm and sophisticated legal departments with a national agency. Prior to pursuing a career in legal recruiting, Sarah was a practicing attorney having obtained her JD from New England Law. Sarah is a proud New Englander and has called Boston home for the past 13 years. |
Erin Guarascio | Co-Host Erin Guarascio is a Talent Success partner at Axiom. She joined Axiom 3 years ago and has enjoyed working closely with our legal talent ever since. Erin's career path included several years practicing law at an AmLaw 100 firm, time as a legal recruiter and a coach. She enjoys helping others maximize their potential in their personal and professional lives. Erin and her husband live in Naperville, IL (a Chicago suburb) and keep busy chasing after their active, 1-year old son, Andrew. |
Elena Volkova Elena Volkova has deep experience within the financial services industry. Elena has 18+ years of FS experience, served as a Risk & Compliance lawyer, and has been engaged at a multinational bank. With her specialty spanning securities, corporate law, and finance law, Elena is a longtime lawyer who's no stranger to the financial services industry. |
Can't attend? You should still register! We will send out an on-demand recording after the webcast so you can participate when it's convenient for you.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClimate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
4 minute readPreparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 22024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
- 3What We Heard From Litigation Leaders in 2024
- 4Akin and Simpson Create New Practice Groups With Integrated Teams
- 5Thursday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250