Why Some Law Firms Have Remained Silent on 'Dobbs': The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
June 29, 2022 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
'WADE' INTO CONTROVERSY - More large law firms have confirmed they'll pay for travel and out-of-state costs for personnel seeking abortions, after the U.S. Supreme Court's decision last week overturning Roe v. Wade. Still, as Law.com's Andrew Maloney reports, many other firms are keeping quiet on the issue. The law firm announcements come after several corporations said they would cover costs for abortion access. Companies such as Disney, Tesla, Netflix, JPMorgan and others have already introduced policies to cover such costs, with some announcements coming after a draft of the decision was leaked last month. More than two dozen Am Law 200 firms contacted by Law.com have yet to comment on the topic. Others have issued non-committal statements about whether they will pay for out-of-state costs for abortion services. But several others have confirmed, either to Law.com or in internal memos, that they will. Brad Hildebrandt, a longtime law firm consultant, said each firm is looking at this in a different way. "There will be no 'one way,' and it can be very controversial. You have lawyers of all persuasions politically," he said, later adding, "Law firms are trying to tread water here in a careful way. What's best for the firm, its reputation and employees—those are complicated issues."
HIRING AND LOWERING - Veteran legal recruiter John Gilmore told Law.com's Hugo Guzman that, although legal has long been considered a recession-proof sector, he isn't taking the current in-house hiring boom for granted."I've been in [corporate recruiting] for 33 years. I've been through three different downturns, and downturns aren't fun in this business," said John Gilmore, managing partner of BarkerGilmore. "I watch the business world closely, and I see what's going on. I'm not going to be naive about it." According to Gilmore, legal departments already might be showing the effects of an economic slowdown. Although hiring for top executives remains red hot, some companies are holding off on hiring mid-level professionals. When finding strong candidates becomes easier than filling open positions, recruiters will have their first big sign of a hiring downturn, Gilmore said. Another sign to watch for would be a glut of mid-level lawyers, meaning those with four to 10 years of experience, in the job market. But a recession could also lead to fewer available candidates, as more lawyers opt to stay put amid economic uncertainty. "If people don't feel confident making these big life changes, you'll see a slowdown," Sonya Olds Som, global managing partner at Diversified Search Group, told Guzman. "The lifeblood of the legal industry is a certain amount of people deciding that they're comfortable enough, and willing to take risks and make changes."
WHO GOT THE WORK?℠ - Benjamin J. Hodges, Kelly A. Mennemeier and Jennifer L. Gray of Foster Garvey have entered appearances for Green Lake Brewing Co. in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The complaint, filed April 29 in California Central District Court by McCarter & English and Resch Polster & Berger on behalf of premium spirits distributor and importer Proximo Spirits Inc., pursues claims against Green Lake for its ongoing use of the "Kraken" mark in connection with the sale of its beer. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright II, is 2:22-cv-02879, Proximo Spirits, Inc. v. Green Lake Brewing Co., LLC et al. >> Read the filing on Law.com Radar and check out the most recent edition of Law.com's Who Got the Work?℠ column to find out which law firms and lawyers are being brought in to handle key cases and close major deals for their clients.
ON THE RADAR - Amazon.com, Jeffrey P. Bezos and other executives were hit with a securities class action Tuesday in Washington Western District Court stemming from June 2019 U.S. House Committee hearings which concluded that the e-commerce giant made misleading statements and withheld evidence regarding allegations of antitrust activity in the retail market. The complaint, filed by Barrack, Rodos & Bacine and other counsel, contends that Amazon identifies the best-selling third-party merchandise on its platform, then mimics the products under its 'Amazon Basic' brand. The suit further contends that the House committee requested in March that the Department of Justice conduct an investigation into Amazon's alleged practices, and that the Securities and Exchange Commission is currently investigating Amazon's use of third-party seller data. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 2:22-cv-00907, CWA Local 1180 Members' Annuity Fund et al v. Amazon.com Inc et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
GW Law Rejects Call to Ban Justice Thomas From Teaching at the School By Christine Charnosky |
White House Counsel Feared Trump Would Be Charged With 'Every Crime Imaginable' If He Marched to Capitol on Jan. 6, Aide Testifies By Andrew Goudsward |
'All of My Cases Keep Me up at Night': The Heavy Toll of Criminal-Defense Lawyering By Jasmine Floyd |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Federal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
Trump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for US's Hardline Approach to Region
BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250