West Virginia Judge Rules for Drug Distributors in Opioid Case
U.S. District Judge David Faber, in a bench trial that concluded last year in the Southern District of West Virginia, sided with distributors McKesson, Cardinal Health and AmerisourceBergen in a 184-page decision about the opioid crisis.
July 05, 2022 at 04:55 PM
7 minute read
PharmaceuticalsWhat You Need to Know
- The decision mirrors findings from judges in California and Oklahoma that found for the drug companies in other opioid cases.
- The judge was persuaded that all three defendants had programs in place to monitor suspicious prescription orders and that the 'overwhelming majority' of doctors were acting in good faith.
- The ruling questioned the plaintiffs' proposed abatement plan, which would have provided $2.5 billion to Cabell County and the city of Huntington.
A federal judge in West Virginia who heard a bench trial last year sided with three drug distributors in one of the longest decisions to date over the opioid crisis.
U.S. District Judge David Faber of the Southern District of West Virginia's 184-page decision mirrored some of the key points in prior opioid rulings in California and Oklahoma, but he had additional reasons for ruling against the plaintiffs, including the fact that all three defendants had programs in place to monitor suspicious prescription orders.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Ozempic Defendants Seek to Shave 'Tacked On' Claims From MDL Complaint Ozempic Defendants Seek to Shave 'Tacked On' Claims From MDL Complaint](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2024/01/Ozempic-767x633.jpg)
Ozempic Defendants Seek to Shave 'Tacked On' Claims From MDL Complaint
3 minute read![Indiana AG Accuses Big Pharma of Inflating EpiPens Price by 600%, Lawsuit Says Indiana AG Accuses Big Pharma of Inflating EpiPens Price by 600%, Lawsuit Says](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2021/07/EpiPen-03_424766-767x633.jpg)
Indiana AG Accuses Big Pharma of Inflating EpiPens Price by 600%, Lawsuit Says
4 minute read![Plaintiff Narrowly Avoids Dismissal Over Lengthy Complaint Filed in Federal Court Plaintiff Narrowly Avoids Dismissal Over Lengthy Complaint Filed in Federal Court](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/415/2021/10/10_Prescription_Drugs_Pills_Money_Adobe_640x640.jpg)
Plaintiff Narrowly Avoids Dismissal Over Lengthy Complaint Filed in Federal Court
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250